Bani Israel

 1) „Hebrew“ – The Big Lie.

One of the greatest LIES that has been passed onto the world (except for a very tiny minority who are aware of the truth but afraid or reluctant to come out with it) is that Judaism is a racial nationality.  This claim is not only an insult to human intelligence, but an insult to history as well. How can Jews be a „race“, when every evidence shows that there are African Jews (from Ethiopia), Russian Jews, German Jews, Yemeni Jews, even Persian Jews. How can this be? The truth of the matter is that Judaism is a CREED – a religious belief system, no different than Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism. By the same logic, we see Arab Christians, European Christians, Ethiopians Christian, and even Chinese Christians. Has anyone ever claimed that Christianity is a race? 

In order for the Zionist movement to hijack the history of the region and plant their illegal Jewish state in Palestine, it was necessary to create all the elements required for a “racial nationality”. And one of those elements is LANGUAGE.

Quote

Language IS the nation. And the nation IS the language. And there is no life for the nation without a language”.

That  was the famous quote of Eliezar bin Yehuda, the man who is credited as the “reviver” of the so-called “Hebrew” language (when the truth – as we shall soon see – is that he CREATED the language from scratch). Bin Yehuda understood, since the beginning of the Zionist project, the importance and necessity of this matter for the continuity of the Jewish “nationality”. In fact there were many common means used by both the Nazis of Germany and the Zionist movement to achieve their goals. And one of those means was: „Lie and lie and lie and keep on lying, until eventually, the people will believe you“ The Zionists kept on claiming, since the beginning of their imperial project, that there was once, a long, long time ago, a divine language called “Hebrew”, and that it was the language of God’s Chosen People, which was then lost or became “dormant”, when the “Hebrews” were scattered and exiled from their alleged “Promised Land” 

David Ben Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel, once said: 

Quote

The Hebrew language died out, because it hasn’t been a spoken language for over 2000 years”.

This statement, and many others along its line, were used to explain why this “language” is mysteriously not found in any ancient dictionary or glossary, and is not mentioned in any historic document the world has ever known.

The facts that you are about to read will shock you, brothers and sisters.  The glaring truth is that there was never any language in this entire region but the Mother Tongue,  and the various dialects that branched from it: Aramaic, Syriac, Old Yemeni, Kananite, Amorite, Phoenician, etc…

Encyclopedia Britannica states that:

Quote“ 

The original authors of the Old Testament are unknown; furthermore, it is not certain whether those who compiled it were individuals or groups. The Old Testament was originally recorded almost exclusively in Hebrew, with the exception of very few passages which were recorded in Aramaic. The first Jewish community eventually translated the entire text of the Torah (the Five Books) to Aramaic”.
Isn’t it strange that it has never occurred to anyone to ask the following questions: 

1- Why was it translated into Aramaic?
2- Who was this “first” Jewish group or community responsible for its translation?
3- If the language had been dead for 2000 years, how did it suddenly “pop up”, alive and well, in Palestine, in the 20th Century, and in coincidence with the occasion of the return to the alleged “Promised Land”?

Did this “Hebrew” language even exist in the first place?

An article written by Professor G.A.Driver, who taught modern Hebrew at the university of Oxford, UK,  stated: 

Quote

the Term ‘Hebrew’ is actually a creation by the Jewish Rabbis in Palestine, which came at a much later time. This is proven by the fact that the word was not known or used to refer to the Jews in Russia, until after the 15th Century”

(Source: Waleed al Khalidi “From Crying Over the Ruins to the Control of The Arab World” – Al Hayat: 29/08/1997 – www.daralhayat.com)

The Zionist movement commissioned prominent Russian literary figure Eliezar bin Yehuda, who was among the first immigrants to Palestine, to write a linguistic glossary of the ancient Aramaic language, fused with the Yiddish dialect of the German Jews. Ben Yehuda wrote the entire framework for this new language, and sought to spread it and plant it in the new Jewish community in Palestine. 

The giant French scholar and thinker Pierre Rossi in his outstanding book : The City of Isis – the True History of the Arabs says” (pages 28,29), says:

Quote

Modern Hebrew is an invention of the Russian Eliazar, who published a literary and linguistic glossary in the period from 1910 until 1922, as was required by the global Zionist movement, and proposed it as a kind of “Esperanto” for the Jews all over the world, who been promised a new home in Palestine. It was nothing but a political tool”

A political tool. In other words, A LIE CREATED FOR POLITICAL MANIPULATION.

The invention of the modern Hebrew language was a very crucial condition for the success of the colonial Zionist movement. This language, of whom there is not a SINGLE mention in any document, text, or archeological trace, in the entire literary history of the ancient world, suddenly became a living reality! 

Quote

No mention of it (Hebrew) is found in any of the thousands  of  cuniform, and  hieroglyphic texts….nor even in any ancient Aramaic document was ever a single reference to a Hebrew language”

(page 25: Rossi).

Bin Eliazar called for making “Hebrew” the language of the age for the new Jewish settlers, to be spoken by the youngsters in their homes, in their schools, and on the streets. The goal of all of this was to eventually create, artificially, all the elements needed for a new “racial nationality”:

1-  Annex the land.
2- Hijack the entire history of the region.
3- Project the geography of the Old Testament events onto others‘ lands.
4- Invent the language.

In his excellent study entitled Zionist Racism and the Philosophy of Jewish Upbringing” Professor Abdulqader Fares says: 

Quote

“…and so Hebrew became the official language; so much so, that the elderly generation, who immigrated to Palestine, were forced to learn it from their children! This is because the fathers who had migrated from their original homelands in Europe, had never heard of such a language, so they were forced to learned it from the younger generations”.

Now you tell me: Are all these scholars delusional? Or is it the „sheeple“ of the world who have been victims of these delusions?

The fact is that the term “Hebrew” was never known by the Jewish communities living in the various countries of the world, until the 1920’s, when the Zionist project began taking shape.

I will show you now, brothers and sisters, glaring proof that what we have always thought were independent Semitic languages, are in fact nothing but various dialects of one original tongue. And this truth has been declared time and time again by modern  anthropologists and linguists, among them: William Wright, Edward Dorm, Sabatino Moscati, Kamal Salibi, Pierre Rossi, and many others, all of whom have proved that these dialects did indeed have one common origin: The Mother Tongue.  (Think of it as somewhat like the relationship between French, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian one hand, and Latin on the other).

And recent archeological discoveries in Arabia – despite their scarcity – have proved them right.

These scientists conducted extensive research on the Semitic dialects, and found staggering similarities between them, notably: The presence of three-letter verb roots for the words, the presence of two tenses (past and present) for those verbs, and very similar conjugation structures between them. In all these dialects, there are glaring similarities among the pronouns, words that indicate sibling relationships, body parts, numbers, natural phenomena, you name it…

These scientists, who were not afraid to come out with the truth, have realized that the original community from which sprang all Semitic people spoke a language that was very similar to the „Arabic“ of the Quran. In this regard, Muskati says:

Quote

In light of all the information that we, as anthropologists have been able to gather, there is now undeniable evidence which indicates that Arabia was the point of origin for all Semitic migrations“

This shattering truth, dear reader, requires that we reconsider all that we have ever known about the so-called “Semitic Languages”, and how they spread in the region. The traditional experts have always divided the Semitic languages into Northern (Aramaic, Syriac, Phoenician), and Southern (Arabic, Old Yemeni, Ethiopian). 

However, archeological discoveries during the last Century have turned this classification upside down. Ancient Arabic scriptures were found as far north as Jordan, while Aramaic and Syriac writings dating as far back as the 4th Century BC were unearthed in Yemen!

In one excellent article written by member Ayman, way back in 2006, he talked about what was known as the „Language Barrier“, and the reality of Aramaic and Arabic and the place they occupied in the culture of the Nabateans. 

Here is a reminder about this important issue:

An article presented by the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, mentioned that the Nabateans (the people of ancient Jordan, whose capital was Petra) spoke two languages: Aramaic and Arabic. The first was the formal language used for religious, political and legal writings (treaties with other kingdoms, royal decrees, etc…). Whereas the second, Arabic, was the “common people’s” language, used in the everyday life of the ordinary man. The domain of Arabic in Nabatea was restricted to poetry, love stories, tales of their desert travels and ordeals, and folk legends or traditions. 

Please check out the following link:  http://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/avdat.html

Brother Ayman, however, told us only one half of the truth: The presence of Arabic as far north as Jordan, in the pre-Christian times. What he did NOT tell us about was the dozens of Aramaic texts dating as far back as the 4th Century BC, which were unearthed as far south as Yemen! 

The photo below shows one of many such inscriptions. It is an incense  burner with Aramaic scribbling on it, unearthed near Najran in the early 1990’s.  It dates back to the 1st Century B.C, and is on display at the Saudi National Museum. 

The script reads: “This burner is a gift from Naja bin Arshan bin Nahel, from him and his family, as a token of gratitude”

This discovery has not only baffled archeologists, but proved that the great scholars whose voices went unheard for decades, like Pierre Rossi, Moskati, Kamal Salibi, and many others, were not delusional at all when they reiterated what the ancient Greek and Roman geographers had said:  Arabia is the source of all Semitic migrations, and the cradle of all Semitic dialects, and that what we call “Arabic” today existed side by side with these other dialects, all across Arabia. 

The truth that anthropologists have discovered, since the late 19th Century, is that the Semitic migrations from South West Arabia began as early back as 6000 B.C, when the ancient peoples of Arabia settled the Levant and Mesopotamia. Even the most stubborn Western scholars are beginning to accept this fact now.

In an interview on “Al-Quds Television” in 2003, Kamal Salibi said:

Quote

“….This his has turned all that we have ever known about Semitic languages upside down. It is time we made a deep evaluation of all that we have known about this issue. It seems that the known Semitic languages (Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, Phoenician. Kananite, and others…) were no more than dialects of the same tongue, and existed side by side, as far south as Yemen, and as far North as Syria and Jordan”.

This is in fact a reiteration of what Salibi had said earlier, in his book which shook the world The Torah Came from Arabia” (1985) Salibi says:

Quote

There is no strangeness that the Arabic tongue co-existed with the other Semitic dialects as far back as the Old Testament times. Arabic, whether in its phonology or its morphology, is in fact the oldest of all those dialects. And this truth has been confirmed by the experts starting from the late 19th Century”.

Everything that we have been taught about Semitic “languages” is a LIE. The division of Semitic “languages” into Northern and Southern is a complete FALLACY. And there is no doubt in my mind that this truth has been known all along, and hidden on purpose, by some diabolical will.

But, as with all matters, the Sunna of Allah dictates that the truth will ultimately devour the lies, no matter what the rejecters do.

And the truth that will soon be made apparent to you, brothers and sisters, as you read these threads I am presenting to you, is that the eloquent dialect of the Quran is a sample of the oldest dialect in existence. The eloquent tongue of the Quran, composed of three-letter roots sounds taken directly from natural phenomena, was the language of Adam. And it was in this dialect that Allah revealed his final scripture to mankind. 

You can reject and ridicule this idea now, and as long as you want. But in time, eventually, you will accept it: What we call “Arabic” is in fact THE Proto-Semitic tongue. It is a language whose alphabet existed LONG before it was ever written. This is why it has always taken second place in terms of spread and appearance, and why its origins have always been shrouded in mystery. Its relation to the other Semitic dialects is comparable to the relation between Spanish, French, Portuguese and Italian on one hand, and Roman on the other. 

These dialects existed SIDE BY SIDE, all over Arabia. During the time of Muhamad, there were people who spoke Aramaic, Syriac, Thamudic, and even Old Yemeni, living alingside the speakers of Arabic. Until we accept this truth, we will never know the true history of Islam. The Quran calls these other dialects „A3jami“, to distinguish them from the „eloquent tongue“. Now, if you look up the true meaning of the root „3jm“, you will get definitions along the lines of: something incomplete / imperfect  / something that struggles to convey a meaning / something that struggles to be, but cannot reach completion. 

The eloquent tongue of the Quran is the MOTHER OF ALL TONGUES, and is the proto-type of what we call the „Semitic Languages“. Its alphabet is more complete than the others, and its grammatical structure – as phonetic experts have concluded – is a testament that it is, in fact, older than the others.

So now the question is: Where does the so-called “Hebrew” language stand?

Let’s go back to what Encyclopedia Britannica says: 

Quote

The original authors of the Old Testament are unknown; furthermore, it is not certain whether those who compiled it were individuals or groups. The Old Testament was originally recorded almost exclusively in Hebrew, with the exception of very few passages which were recorded in Aramaic. The first Jewish community eventually translated the entire text of the Torah (the Five Books) to Aramaic”.

Do you believe this joke?

Has anyone on this planet ever proven the existence of a language called “Hebrew” – a language which they claim had become “dormant” for 2000 years before it was “revived” in the Promised Land?

Here is the truth about this so-called “Hebrew”:

The letters you see below are Old Aramaic. Linguists estimate that they were used as early as the 10th Century B.C. Now, dear brothers and sisters, note the 22 letters of this alphabet. They are the SAME letters of the Arabic alphabet, with the exception of 6 letters that are not found in Aramaic (I’ll tell you what they are later). The Aramaic letters are: 

أ – ب – ج – ده – و – ز – ح – ط – ي–  ك – ل – م – ن – س – ع – ف ص – ق – رش 
ت.

The Aramaic dialect is in fact nothing but one of the extinct dialects which originated in Arabia, and spread northwards with the first Semitic migrations. I know that this truth is shocking to many of you, but if you bear with me a little, you will see it all. Along with Syriac, Kananite, Old Yemeni (which is very similar to Ethiopian), Thamudic, Saba’ean, and Amorite, these dialects formed the corpus of what Allah called “A3jami dialects” in the Quran, to distinguish them from the eloquent dialect (which we call “Arabic”). Now, of course, the Arabic we speak today is GARBAGE, and bears very little connection to the Eloquent Tongue of the Quran, which contains 6 letters not found in Aramaic or Syriac.

Now, take a close look at the following letters, which linguists call “Squared Aramaic”:

Do these look familiar to you?

These are the SAME letters which they call “Hebrew”! Every one of them! And you can go search anywhere, and surf the net, and read all you want, until you get dizzy and nauseated, and you will not reach any other conclusion. I guarantee it. These Squared Aramaic letters are estimated to have first appeared around the 6th or 7th Century B.C, which coincides with the Babylonian Exile era.  

This is the truth that the ancient Jewish scribes wanted to hide all along. And now, in our modern times, every time someone comes close to exposing this LIE, they will immediately say: Hebrew does in fact USE squared Aramaic letters, but it is a different language!”   

The fact of the matter is that there is not a single document in the entire history of the ancient world which mentions anything about a “Hebrew” language!

Now listen to what they said to explain the absence of any mention of this language: It was dormant for many centuries” (Applause and drums, please!)

And listen to what they said to explain the HUNDREDS of Arabic words found in this so-called “Hebrew”:  In its revival, it made use of many Arabic terms which were introduced into it”.

Have we had enough crap or what? 

What they call “Hebrew Language” is nothing but Aramaic, after it has been injected with one of the rural dialects of Germany, known as the „Yiddish“. The Zionists INVENTED this language from scratch, and then came out to the world claiming its “holiness” and “originality”. 

And Aramaic, in turn, is nothing but an extinct south Arabian dialect. (well, maybe not 100% extinct, as there are still certain pockets in Syria and Iraq that speak it). And you can check for yourself the 22 letters of Squared Aramaic, and realize that they are the very same alleged “Hebrew” letters. And then how do you explain this similarity in the actual order of the letters:  

 

أبجدهـوزحطي-….
Who are they kidding?

We can say with 100% confidence: This language didn’t even exist! They made it up from scratch. And those who wrote the so-called “Five Books” of the Torah are not “unknown” as Encyclopedia Britannica claims. They were originally an ancient tribe from the distant childhood of Arabia. And these five books were at some point, accurate records documenting the journeys of this tribe, whose name was “Bani Israel” in the Heights of Asir and Yemen, and the trials and tribulations they went through. Later on however, these records  were corrupted  during the Babylonian exiles, and then by the Septuagint priests in Egypt.

In fact, the Old Testament itself does NOT even mention a “Hebrew” language! Go ahead and read the entire OT, from cover to cover, and see for yourselves.

__________

So, if „Hebrew“ is not a language, then what does the word mean?

This is what we will see next…

__________

  1. Hebrew” – A Language, or a Description?

    Whenever this word “Hebrew” is mentioned, it immediately brings to our minds a nation or a people who have embraced Judaism as their creed, who speak a certain language that has been decreed exclusively for them by God, and who consider the Old Testament to be their sacred text.

    But is this what the word really means? Or was the term given – for political reasons – a meaning that was different from its original context, in order to create the illusion of a “chosen people” racially superior to all others?

    We have seen from the previous post that this language “Hebrew” never existed in the first place. And what we hear the “Israelis” speaking today is a corrupted form of Aramaic that was created, from scratch, by the Zionist movement in the early 20th century, and infused with the rural Yiddish dialect of Germany, as well as hundreds of Arabic words. And the proof is that the elderly generation who migrated to Palestine, their alleged „Promised Land”, had never even heard of this language, and were forced to learn it from the younger generation.

    The truth we are about to reveal, which only few people are aware of, is that the word “Hebrew” or “3ibri – 3ibrani” (singular) / „3ibriyyoun“ (plural) is an Arabic term, more precisely an adjective, used to describe those who have “crossed over”, or “crossed from one region to another”. In fact, the word “3ubour” (crossing a region, river, valley, etc…) is derived from it. 

    So does this word really carry in its meaning a certain people who have a special exclusive language, and who follow a certain creed?

    If we look in the old and forgotten books of the Arab geographers, we can see glaring clues as to the real meaning of the word “3ibri”. 

    For example, geographer and historian Yaqoot al-Hamwi gives us the following explanation:

    ما أخذ على غربي الفرات إلى برية العرب يسمى العبر، وإليه ينسب العبريون من اليهود لأنهم لم يكونوا عبروا الفرات حينئذ…“

    What is Yaqoot saying here? 

    Translation:  […The region west of the „Phorat“, which encompases the wilderness of Arabia is called „Al-3ibr“. And to this region are associated the „3ibriyyoun“ (HEBREWS) from among the Jews, once they crossed the Phorat].Source: Yaqoot (Mu3jam al Buldan – Vol 4 – page 78)

    Another prominent geographer, Al- Bakri al- Andalusi casts more light on the subject, in his book entitled “Mu3jam ma Stu3jam”. Here is what he says:

    وتهامة: ما ساير البحر، منها مكة والعبر والطور والجزيرةفالعبر: ما أخذ على الفرات إلى برية العرب.   

    What is al-Andalusi trying to tell us? 

    He begins by giving us a geographical definition of “Tahama” (This is the same „Tahum“ which appears 30 times in the original Aramaic Torah, and has left Biblical scholars dumbfounded as to its meaning). „Tahama“ تهامة   is a coastal area along the Red Sea (“ma sayara al-bahri”) which includes – among other locations:  Mecca, Al-3ibr, Al-Tur, and Al-Jazeera.  So the “3ibr”  is within Tahama, which is a greater coastal region that also includes the valley where Mecca lies today.  Then he gives the same definition of this “3ibr” as Yaqoot al Hamwi, by saying:  “the area stretching from the Phorat across the Arabian wilderness”.

    Al-Andalusi and Yaqoobi are basically telling us:

    1- That there was a wilderness area known to the Arabs as “al-3ibr”, which was part of Tahama (the coastal region extending from Mecca, all the way to the “elbow” of Arabia in Yemen).

    2-  This area was bounded by the Red Sea coast on one side, and by the Phorat on the other. 

    3- ALL those who „cross“ (ya3bur) this area of the wilderness near the coastal strip ( “3ibr”), and make their way towards the Surat Mountains (The Heights) along the Red Sea coast were called “3ibran” or “3ibraniyyeen”  (HEBREWS).
     ANd among them were the Jews, when they crossed the Phorat.

    Hence, “Hebrew” was an adjective – a label – given by the inhabitants of the Tahama coastal region and its mountains to all those who came from across the wilderness of Arabia, seeking sanctuary in the shades and streams of the Surat.

    Included in the region of Tahama is also a very famous mountain known to the Arabs for ages untold. They called it „al-Tur“. And I will tell you now what it means, and prove to you that it is NOT in the Sinai Pennisula.

    The Quran calls it:  “Tur Seeneen”   (NOT “Tur Sinai”). And the word “seeneen” is a PLURAL noun. The question is: A plural of what?

    There is a very well known tree which grows in the mountainous regions of  Western Arabia called “seeniya”  (shajarat al-seeniya). If you go and investigate this further, you will see that it is the same tree which they call, in the common Arabic, “al-3ulleiq”  العليق.

    Now, if you look it up in a translator, you get “BRAMBLE”  

    Here is what Ibn Manzhour tells us in “lisan al Arab” about the word “seeneen”:

    والسينينية : شجرة ؛ حكاه أبو حنيفة عن الأخفش ، وجمعها سينين ، قال : وزعم الأخفش أن طور سينين مضاف إليه ؛

    Note the underlined definition he gives us:  Al-Seeniyya = a type of tree. The plural form is „seeneen“.

    What this means is that the “Tur” mentioned in the Quran is a wooded mountain, on which several kinds of trees grow. In fact, the Quran talks about another tree in that mountain:

    {And a tree which emerges from the Tur Sineen (the mountain of brambles), grows oil and is a relish for those who eat} …[23:30]

    What is this tree being mentioned here? Does this sound like it’s in the desert in the middle of the Sinai Pennisula? Has anyone ever PROVEN that the mountain the Jews worship over there was called „Al-Tur“? Moreover, how did the word “seeneen”, a plural noun which appears in the Quran indicating a type of tree (bramble), become the proper noun „Sinai“, given to the pennisula east of Egypt? 

    Going back to the issue of “Hebrews”, we can conclude that the word means: “those who have crossed over” . And we have seen where this area of crossing over is, in relation to Tahama (the coastal strip of Arabia).  

    The question is: How did this adjective, which the inhabitants of Tahama used to describe ANY and ALL who crossed over the wilderness and came to settle in their mountainous region, become a term EXCLUSIVELY used for the Children of Israel? 

    This is another of the many forgeries which they perpetrated to hide the true identity of the Israelites. The truth of the matter is that Abraham (P) was called “Hebrew” in the Torah. Why is that so?  The OT texts speak of Abraham as: „The Hebrew“, and elsewhere as “The lost Aramian” (meaning that he was looking for a place to settle). This is because Abraham was among the first to “cross over” and settle in the region of Tahama. Interestingly, the Torah NEVER uses the term “Hebrew” to describe Abraham’s sons, Ismael and Isaac. Why is that so? Could it be because they didn’t cross over with their father? Could it be because they were BORN in the region of Tahama?  Nowehere in the Torah do we read about “Ismael the Hebrew” or “Isaac the Hebrew” or even “Jacob the Hebrew”.  But we do read about “Joseph the Hebrew” for reasons that we will show you very soon.   (What I am trying to tell you here is that the Torah describes Abraham as “Hebrew”. Then, this term disappears and is not mentioned  anywhere in relation to his descendants Ismael, Isaac, and Jacob, only to re-appear again with the mention of Joseph). This is very important and needs to be looked into. The descendants of Abraham did not migrate across the Arabian wilderness to the coastal mountain region. They were born IN the region of Tahama. So technically, theye were descendants of a Hebrew, but were not Hebrews themselves. They were simply „Israelites“. 

    The proof that the word “Hebrew” does not indicate a language or a particular “Pure and Chosen Race” is found in the Torah itself.

    Take a look at the following passages from the Old Testament, which talks about one of the many laws that Moses is claimed to have taught his people:

    „Now these [are] the judgments which you [O Moses] shall set before them: „If you buy a Hebrew servant, he shall serve six years; and in the seventh he shall go out free and pay nothing.  „If he comes in by himself, he shall go out by himself; if he [comes in] married, then his wife shall go out with him. „If his master has given him a wife, and she has borne him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself.  „But if the servant plainly says, ‚I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,‘   „then his master shall bring him to the judges. He shall also bring him to the door, or to the doorpost, and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him forever”  (Exodus 21: 2-6)

    These regulations given by Moses to the Israelites clearly distinguish between the Israelites themselves (who, by that time, were established in the Tahama area, near the ancient trade routes), and the slaves, among whom were Hebrews who “crossed over” towards the new homeland of the Israelites. The latter were bought and sold as SLAVES, and this was absolutely FORBIDDEN to the Israelites to do it among themselves!   Has anyone ever heard of an Israelite (a member of “God’s Chosen People”) buying or selling another Israelite as a slave?

    But then, why is Joseph called “Hebrew”?? Wasn’t he too, born in the Tahama region?

    This is because the inhabitants of the Tahama region of Arabia, who had control of the entire coastal region (including the trade routes) still considered the later generations of Israelites as being somewhat “beneath them”, and looked upon them with some kind of contempt. As such, Joseph in particular was still considered “Hebrew”, even though he was born in that region. (It is because his ancestor, Abraham, was not originally from that land, but migrated to there)

    This is why, we read in the Torah as well, the following passage:

    So they set him [Joseph] a place by himself, and them by themselves, and the Egyptians who ate with him by themselves; because the Egyptians could not eat food with the Hebrews, for that [is] an abomination to the Egyptians. (Genesis 43:32)

    Pay attention to the context of the word “Egyptians” in the above text. In the original Aramaic text, the word we see is “Misrim”.

    What the passage is saying is: The MISRIM could not eat food with the Hebrews (because they were disgusted by them, and viewed them as beneath their station). 

    The Septuagint criminals, however, perpetrated a blatant forgery by replacing the word MISRIM  (or “msrm” as it appears in the original, silent, Aramic  text), with “Aegypto“.

    But I will show you now how their forgery was exposed:

    Whenever someone forges a text, he is bound to make a mistake somewhere, which gives away his crime. Among the glaring forgeries that were perpetrated by the Septuagint priests (which suited the interests of the Ptolemic rulers of Egypt), was that they looked for every single instance of the word “Misrim”, and replaced it with “Aegypto”. But there was one instance that they mistakenly failed to pay attention to. There is one passage in their forged Torah which mentions “Misrim” in its true context:

    Take a look at this please:

    If the Tribe of Egypt will not come up and enter in, they [shall have] no [rain;] they shall receive the plague with which the LORD strikes the nations who do not come up to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. (Zecheriah 14:18)

    Why is „Egypt“ being described here as a “tribe”     (in some modern translations of the Torah, the passage mentions “family of Egypt”, while in others we read “clan of Egypt”).

    My question to you is the following:

    Has anyone EVER heard of Egypt being described as a „tribe“ or a „clan“?

    If you look at the original Aramaic text of Zecheriah, it says:  Mishfaht Misrim”.  The word “Mishfaht”      مشفحت    is an Aramaic word meaning TRIBE. 

    Also, the two letters “i” and “m” added to the ends of words are used to denote the plural tense in the Aramaic dialect. This is also the exact same phenomenon which we encounter in the Old Yemeni (Himyarite) dialect, and is only ONE of the DOZENS of similarities between the two, proving that they all originated in the same geographical region. 

    Here are other examples of this Aramaic plural form:

    Eloh – Elohim  (god – gods)
    Cherub – Cherubim (angel – angels)
    Katub – Katubim (book – books)
    Himyar – Himyarim (Himyarite – Himyarites)
    Msr – Msrim  (MISR – MISRAIM)

    So the word  MSRM  is the plural form of MSR. (This is exactly how it appears in the original Aramaic text, which did not contain vowels).

    So what is MSR then? According to the passage of Zacharia, it is a TRIBE. And this tribe  had control of the Tahama region of Arabia. Furthermore, The “s” in “MSR” is the heavy “sadd” sound, which in Arabic is pronounced    ص .  This is why the name is written مصريم in the Arabic translations  (NOT  مسريم).

    So the text is talking about the TRIBE OF  MSR  قبيلة مصر

    And these people are the same  MSRM  (in the plural tense) who were disgusted at the idea of eating with Joseph the “Hebrew” (whose ancestors were outsiders and had migrated to their region, and where therefore looked upon with disdain).

    And they were NOT Egyptians.

    Abraham never set foot in Egypt, nor did his descendents.  

    So who are those people then? What is this TRIBE of MSR??

    I will not reveal this information here. I will leave it for a special thread about Abraham’s journey. So I will let you guess and do some research. But I will give you three clues:

    1- There was once, long ago, a GIGANTIC tribe in Arabia, which included many clans within its fold. And this tribe was so legendary, that it is now commonly known to all historians, and is mentioned in many verses of ancient Arabic poetry.

    2- The various clans of this huge tribe lived in the region known as Tahama – تهامة  (The „Tahum“ of the Aramaic Torah), and had control of the Red Sea Coast of the Hijaz, and Asir.

    3- The Aramaic version of the name is MSR (with the heavy ‘s’ sound), which differs from the Arabic version of the name, because there are 6 letters in the Arabic alphabet not found in Aramaic. 

    So I leave it up to you, for now, to try to figure out who they are, while also keeping in mind that the following website (link below) came VERY, VERY close to the truth concerning the identity of “MISRM” 

    http://oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Arabia     
    (scroll down to the 12th paragraph: THE NORTH-ARABIAN MUSRI AND THE OLD TESTAMENT MISRAIM ).

    So scratch your heads a bit, dear readers, and try to crack this puzzle: who is the Tribe of Misrm?  And when you do find the answer, you will know immediately that you have, because your jaw will probably drop to the floor.

    We conclude from all of the above, that the term “Hebrew” simply means: “Those who have migrated or crossed-over from one region to another”. And in the context of our subject it has now become clear: 

    The Bani Israel were the grand-children (descendants) of Abraham, the Hebrew (3abrani)  who had migrated / crossed  (3abar) the wilderness of Arabia and settled in the mountainous and fertile region of Asir, which Allah describes as the “Blessed Land” (because of its rich resources, fruits, and many fresh water streams and rivers). This land was home to the legendary Arab tribe of MSR (as the name is spelled in Aramaic, due to the LACK OF A CERTAIN ALPHABETICAL LETTER).

    So the Israelites were not the only „Hebrews“. They were among those who had “crossed over” from the wilderness of Arabia to its shady and fertile mountainous regions. ANY and ALL who migrated in this same manner were given the label of  “Hebrews” (3abran) by the inhabitants of Tahama.

    And this Arabic term “3abrani” is still used even today in some Arab countries, like Jordan or Syria, where it describes the inhabitants of the rural areas (or small villages) who make the trip to the capital, by bus,  as they “cross over” the wilderness towards the large urban centers.

    It is a word that is deeply imbedded in the memory of Arabia, and provides further evidence as to where the events of the Torah took place.

    ______________

    3) Homeland of the Israelites

    The events described in the Old Testament never took place in Palestine. They took place in the Surat Country of south west Arabia, the mountainous and coastal region stretching from Asir down to Yemen. Hence, Bani Israel were an ancient Arabian tribe, and the creed of Judaism (associated with the the city of Sana’a – mentioned in the Old Testament  by its ancestral name of „Uzal“) and the Nasraniyya (associated with the city of Najran) were born among them, and then spread to other lands of the ancient world carried on the wings of the Semitic migrations.

    The Quran distinguishes very clearly between the concept of “Bani Israel” and the concept of “Judaism”. The two are not synonymous, as the deluded occupants of Palestine and the vast majority of Muslims think.  They seem to think that every Jew is an Israelite, and the opposite is also true: every Israelite is a Jew. The Quran denies this claim completely, and differentiates between the Children of Israel, who were the descendants of a single man named “Israel” (I am not 100% sure he was Jacob himself, because the Quran mentions him by name), and Judaism.

    Bani Israel were a tribe.

    And the ancient tribes of Arabia were very often named after the father of the tribe.

    Examples: 

    – Bani Umayya = the descendants of a man named Umayya.
    – Bani Hashim = the descendants of a man named Hashim.
    – Bani Qurayzha = the descendants of a man named Qurayzha
    – Bani Abbas =  the descendants of a man named Abbas.
    – Bani Israel =  the descendants of a man named Israel.

    {Those are the ones whom Allah has blessed from among the prophets from the progeny of Adam, and those We carried with Noah, and from the progeny of Abraham and Israel, and from whom We have guided and chosen. When the revelations of the Almighty are recited to them, they fall down prostrating, and in tears}…[19:58]

    So as you can see, this man “Israel” came shortly after the time of Abraham, which places him very close to Jacob and Isaac (chronologically speaking). And this man, along with many of his first progeny, lived and died many centuries before Judaism even appeared. 

    {Or do you say that Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the Clans were Jewish or Nazarenes?“ Say: „Are you more knowledgeable or is Allah?“ Who is more wicked than the one who conceals a testimony with him from Allah? Allah is not unaware of what you do}…[2:140]

    Now this may sound strange to many of you, but the Quran clearly says that the entire succession of prophets, starting from Noah and down to Muhamad (P) were ONE lineage. The Quran was recounting to Muhamad the story of his ancestors, who lived in the same geographical region as he did. Nowhere does the Quran associate between Bani Israel and Palestine. This is a great lie that has infiltrated the beliefs of the Muslims, who have deserted Allah’s book and followed the lies of human shayateen. 

    The age-old presence of Bani Israel as well as Judaism in Arabia is clearly attested to in the ancient Arabic poetry. In fact, Judaism was the creed of the Yemeni kings of the Himyaritic Dynasty, ever since it was first established in the year 120 BC.

    The ancient Isralites established, somewhere between the 10th Century B.C and the 8th Cnetury B.C, a small kingdom in the Surat Country. The word “Surat” means the “High land” or “the Heights”, which includes the elevated plateau  of “Najd” as well as the mountainous range stretching from the Hijaz to the north, all the way to the “elbow” of Yemen in the south.  This region is the greenest and most fertile strip of land in all of Arabia, and contains many volcanic peaks which were active in the distant past. The most famous of these peaks are: “Umm al-Qimam” , “al-Qari3a”, and “3akwah”. In fact these volcanoes played a major role in the destruction of the people of Lot (whom the Quran mentions were very near to the Mother of Towns) as well as the People of the Elephant.

    The Surat peaks are at their highest in Yemen, where they soar to over 3,500 meters. These mountains, the likes of which are not found anywhere in Palestine, match the geography of events in both the Torah and the Quran, concerning prophets David and Solomon. The highest peak in Arabia is “Jabal al Nabi Shuaib” (Mountain of the Prophet Shuaib) in Yemen, which is 3,660 meters high.

    The valleys of the Asir region have been also been known to harbor breeding grounds for locusts, up until not too long ago (So when you think of the Old Testament stories speaking of “locusts” and “famine” which plagued the land of the „Msrim“, you know where to look).

    Check out this link:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUDz6bLKtU8

    It is a video of a locust swarm captured in Saudi Arabia.

    Also, you might want to read the following article:

    http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/saudis-warned-against-eating-locusts-2011-02-09-1.353796

    In fact, Saudi Arabia has witnessed more locust swarms in the last 50 years than all Arab countries combined!

    The land of Asir (a large pportion of which was previously a part of Yemen), is the region that sees the most rain in all of Arabia, both in winter and in summer. It is a land known for its wooden mountains, on which trees of many varieties grow: Junipers, Cedars, Acacia, Bramble (Seeneen / Seena’a) and Cyprus.  Its  mountain slopes have been made into stepped terraces used for planting and agriculture for ages untold, and are among the most fertile regions in the middle east. Figs, olives, dates, grapes, and a wide variety of seeds are grown there until today. The honey of Asir and Yemen is greatly prized globally, and considered one of the finest in the world.  It is a land known for its rich resources of iron, gold, and copper, which were much more plentiful in the distant past (the age of David and Solomon). 

    If you think Arabia is all desert, you better think again, as you check out the following link:

    http://irhal.com/ar/forum/travel-1172.html 

    In case you can’t read Arabic, I’ll tell you what those photos are (from top to bottom):

    1 – The city of Al-Taef
    2 – Cliffs near Abha
    3 – Wooded mountains of Asir
    4 – Wooded vales of Asir
    5 – More Mountains
    6 – Mountain roads of Asir
    7 – No title
    8 – No title

    And in case you are wondering why Allah, in the Quran, swears to Muhamad by the fig, the olive, and the bramble tree, now you know.

    There, amid the mountain peaks and valleys stretching between Najran and Sana’a, was once a extravagant domain established by Solomon, the son of David, many of whose relics are scattered around the county-side, begging to be excavated. Later on, the Himyaritic Jewish Kings of Yemen established their kingdom in that same region. In fact, we can safely say that the few Jews who reside in Yemen today are the last remnants of this religion in the land of its birthplace. 

    The land of the Surat was also a region of great economic and political importance in the distant past, because of its location at the hub of the trade routes. It was a land of trade mediation, caravan service, as well as the source of two substances that were prized more than gold itself: the legendary incense and myrrh of Yemen. So rich was this land that the Greek and Roman geographers labeled it “Arabia Felix”, meaning “Happy” or “Fortunate” Arabia. 

    The Read Sea coast, as I will show you later on, was a spot over which the Egyptians and the Assyrians had fought many great wars. In fact, some Egyptian kings launched campaigns against the coastal region, and even delved deep into the Heart of Arabia, sacking the city of Najran on several occasions. (I will show you later the many ancient Egyptian ruins and relics in Arabia, which the Saudis have always been reluctant to uncover). The Assyrian and Babylonian campaigns, which we were deceived into believeing targeted Palestine, in fact targeted Arabia. Archeological evidence has been unearthed in theTaima’a, which showed that the city had been the winter capital for several Assyrian kings, and was the launching point of several campaings directed at the Red Sea coast (the „Tahama“ of Asir and Yemen), to discipline the rebelious Arabian tribes. The Romans did the same, later on, as I will show you.

    In contracst, there is ZERO archeological evidence of such wars ever having taken place over Palestine. The land of ancient Palestine has been proven to be a peripheral region of little or no importance to the great powers of the time. It was not until around 200 BC when Palestine became a significant spot.

    Where was the original Temple of Solomon, for which the Zionists have been looking for for the past 80 years? Refer to the thread entitled “The Search for Muhamad has Ended” and you will find out where the original Ur-Salem was. 

    This blessed land, whose history has been shrouded on purpose; hidden from the consciousness of the world, was the theater of the events surrounding a small tribe from among the many tribes of Asir. And this tribe whose name was  „Bani Israel“, had an experience, somewhere in the heights of Asir and its westen slopes and vales, and left behind a record of it. And this record can be found  today in the five books of what is called – by convention – the Torah (Though this is not necessarily the correct name). This record was, at some point, very accurate and genuine, and documenyed the trials and tribulations that this tribe went through, as it underwent a transition from a life of goat-herding to a sedentary life of agriculture and trade, until the hands of corruption and forgery started to mess with it, beginning from the time of the Babylonian Exile.

    Bani Israel were not aliens to Arabia, nor did they flee to it from the Levant, as the twisted and corrupted history tells us. They were among its original inhabitants. The science of archeology, which the Muslims loathe and despise, is just starting to prove this fact.  And this can be confirmed from all that we know about anthropology as well (the study of human migrations and settlements), which teaches us that humans, by nature, often flocked to places that provided them with opportunities for agriculture, game, or trade, until they are forced to leave by an enemy or invading force. 

    So where did Bani Israel live originally? 

    The corrupted history that we have been taught and that we continue to teach our children in the universities of the East and West, tells us  that Bani Israel were not originally from Arabia, but had migrated or escaped to it from Palestine.  And this, according to them, explains the presence of Jews later on, (at the time of Muhamad), and their communities which were established in the cities of Najran, Khaybar, Yathrib, and Taima’a – cities which were  no less than veritable oasises in Western Arabia. They also claim that the presence of Jews as far south as Yemen was because small bands of them had migrated to there as merchants during the time of Solomon! (They still insist that Solomon’s kingdom was in Palestine, and that the trade relations between ancient Israel and Sheba dicatetd that many Jewish merchants move to Yemen!).  And they have been propagating this crap for centuries, cloacked behind the statement of “God Said So”…. until modern archaelogy began to expose their lies. 

    If Bani Israel had originally migrated to Arabia as refugees, this would mean that in order for them to be established in  the regions of fertility and water, in a peninsula whose area is 80% desert and dry land, they would have had to wage continuous wars against its original inhabitants and kick them out of such oasises. And this in fact never happened, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the history of the region.

    Ban Israel lived in Yemen, Najran, Tayma’a, Khaybar, and other such oasises, in peace with the other inhabitants, and relied on agriculture and trade to make their living, after their ancestors, Jacob and Isaac were transformed from a life of goat herding, to a more sedentary life, thanks to the effort of Joseph who established them along the trade routes (as we saw in the “Pharoah” thread).  If the Isralites were refugees from Palestine, as our false history claims, they would never have been able to achieve all this success in a land whose inhabitants (the Arabs) were known for their love of raids, wars, and looting, and where water sources were more valuable than gold. The Arabs used to kill each other over such oasises…Do you think they would let a tribe of refugees, migrating from Palestine,  simply stroll into the most fertile regions of their land, and settle there without even lifting a finger?

    Please think and reflect on this…

    Place like Najran, Tayma’a, Yathrib and Khaybar were among the most fertile oasies of Arabia. And the ancient Arabs were never known to simply relinquish such places to others. If Bani Israel came as refugees to Arabia from elsewhere, they would never have been able to settle in such places. They would have found nothing but harsh wilderness and deserts awaiting them, and they would have very likely been the target for raiders and looters.  And even if we assumed that the Arabs accepted their presence as refugees – for a while – it is completely out of the question that they would have relinquished their scarce fertile regions to a bunch of foreigners. 

    What we are proposing here is something radically different than what we have always perceived as the unquestionable truth:  

    Bani Israel were not refugees or migrates to Arabia. THEY WERE ALWAYS THERE FROM THE START. They originated there.  And, throughout the years, they benefited from solid leadership and unshakable beliefs and principles, which made them very strong, and hence feared and respected by most other tribes. And in an environment  as lawless and as harsh as Arabia, where no more than 20% of the total area is habitable, one must have been very strong indeed to maintain his wealth and his land, and to protect it from raiders and looters. So how did Bani Israel eventually achieve all the greatness that they had, if they were originally refugees? Was it through fighting wars with the Arabs to kick them out of their lands?

    And the claim that the Israelites were spawned in Egypt, them moved to Palestine, then migrated to Yemen, is nothing but a ridiculous fantasy, whose aim was to hide the true identity of Bani Israel as no more than an Arabian tribe – albeit a special one – and to establish a racist creed claiming that the Israelites were a pure race, and superior to all others. 

    The time has come for us to change our perceptions and accept this truth, or we will be forever looking at our history through the eyes of others…the eyes of those corruptors and forgers who have turned our past upside down, dictating to us who we are and where we came from. 

    BANI ISRAEL WERE THE ANCESTORS OF MUHAMAD. And all the stories of the previous peoples and their prophets, related to us in the Quran, took place in Arabia, and nowhere else. And those LIARS who scattered the prophets to the lands of Egypt, Iraq and the Levant, and divided between father and son and between brother and brother, claiming that Isaac was the „father of the Israelites“ and settled in Palestine, while Ismael was the father of the „savages“ and settled in Arabia, should be all hanged by the you-know-what for their falsehoods, racism, and crimes against history and humanity.

    Until we accept this truth, we will forever be lost in the desert of Jewish delusion and Zionist lies. 

    All the Semitic migration took place FROM Arabia, not TO Arabia. We have been looking at the picture upside down. It is time we turned it around and set it right.  The ancient Arabian tribes migrated from Arabia, and moved northwards toward the Levant, Syria, and Mesopotamia. And the Israelites were no more than one of those many migrating tribes. Migration FROM Arabia is the correct direction of all ancient displacements of people, not the other way around. And this truth, which was often reiterated by the ancient Greek and Roman gegraphers and explorers, and very often ignored, has now been confirmed by modern anthropology. 

    And what was the first thing that migrating tribes or peoples did when they moved to new regions? 
    Answer: They took with them the names of their original homeland – its towns, rivers, mountains, and valleys, and gave them to their new homelands. This process was known to the ancient Arabs as “tayammun” (the word is derived from YUMN , which means: to bring fortune or optimism).

    We will look next at this phenomenon of tayammun, where I will show you how many of the names of cities, mountains, and valleys in Syria, Jordan and Palestine were in fact Tayammuni names.  The most prominent of these names was a city resting on a knoll in ancient Palestine, whose name was mentioned in the Psalms as „The Daughter of Jerusalem“, and „The Daughter of Zion“. 

    So, where was the original or „parent“ of such places?

    I think by now, you know where.

  2. 4) The Migration of Peoples and Names

    In order for us to delve into the depths of Arabia’s history – a history that has been veiled and hidden by the hands of corruption and forgery – we have to understand the phenomenon of “tayammun”, and the effects it has on all geographical searches and evidences. This phenomenon is as old as humanity itself, and will continue to exist as long as there are humans on this Earth, and lands to explore. It consists of migrating tribes taking with them the names of cities or landmarks in the homeland which they left behind, and assigning these names to their new homeland. 

    Although this phenomenon has been unquestionably proven by anthropologists and linguists alike, it can cause some confusion to geographers and historians if it not taken into account when studying the history of the past nations, due to the similarity (duplicates) it creates between names of cities or locations. 

    And nowhere is the phenomenon of tayammun more evident than in ancient Arabia and the Levant regions. And we can see plenty of evidences of this in the forgotten books of history written by Arabs scholars. For example, in his book entitled “Fat2 al – Bari” فتح الباري , geographer and historian Ibn 2ijr  إبن حجر relates to us the following (volume 11 . page 410):

وأما صنعاء فإنما قيدت في هذه الرواية باليمن ، احترازاً من صنعاء التي بالشام . والأصل فيها صنعاء اليمن لما هاجر أهل اليمن في زمن عمر عند فتوح الشام نزل أهل صنعاء في مكان من دمشق فسمى باسم بلدهم„.

Let me translate to you what Ibn 2ijr is saying:  There are two places known as “Sana’a”. There is the famous Sana’a of Yemen (the capital that is at least 2500 years old), and there is another small town on the outskirts of Damascus (capital of Syria) called “Sana’a” as well. Ibn 2ijr tells us that during the Muslim “conquest” (or should I say ILLEGAL ANNEXATION) of the Levant, under Omar bin al-Khatab, the original inhabitants of Yemen settled in that region of the subburbs of Damascus, and it became known as the “New Sana’a” (so to speak). 

So if news of a certain event which happened in Sana’a was being spread, of course the first thing that will come to mind is the Sana’a of Yemen, because of its popularity. But the fact is, the event could very well have taken place in the other, far less known Sana’a which is today a subburb of Damascus.

Now, if we stop a little bit and study this phenomenon in our modern age, we will find that there are countelss names of cities and towns that are duplicated all across the world, especially in the “new” continents that were the target of exploration and colonization. Here are a few examples:

1- The city of Washington, which is today the capital of the USA, was named after a small town by the same name on the outskirts of Newcastle, England. This shows that the people who named the Washingtom of the New World so, were the orignal settlers who had come from Brittain.

2- The city of New Orleans, also in the USA, was named after the old (original) Orleans in France. Everyone in the USA knows full well that a great percentage of the inhabitants of this city are descendants of the original settlers that had migrated from France, bringing with them all the memories and names they held dear to their hearts, as a kind of “optimism charm” to start their lives in the new continent.

3- The city of New York was also named after the original (parent) York, which is in England.

4 – There are no less than 5 cities/towns by the name of „Mecca“ in North America alone! And these cities were named so because of the phenomenon of tayammun.

And this phenomenon included not only the names of cities and towns, but also of famous landmarks or geographical features (rivers, mountains, valleys), as we will soon see.

Going back to Arabia and the Levant, this explains to us the many dupicates in the names of cities all across these regions. And the glaring evidence is that the original name is always found to be in Yemen or Asir. 

You wonder why that is so?

There is the city of Jarash in Jordan….and there is also Jarash in Yemen (same word, جرش).  So which is the original, and which is the tayammuni name? To answer this, we simply need to follow the direction of the migrations.

Here is what the giant Arab geographer, al-Hamadani says about this famous Yemeni location in his book “Description of Arabia” (DoA):

جُرش: هي كورة نجد العليا، وهي من ديار عنز، ويسكنها وترأس فيها العواسج من أشراف حمير، وهم من ولد يريم ذي مقار القيل، ولهم سؤدد عود وجابة اليمانية في نجد إليهم وهم يقومون معهم بحرب عنز وجُرش في قاع، ولها أشراف غربية بعيدة منها تنحدر مياهها في مسيل يمرُّ في شرقيها، بينها وبين حمومة ناصية تسمى الأكمة السوداء، حمومة وحمة وكولة، ثم يلتقي بهذا المسيل أودية ديار عنز حتى تصب في بيشة بعطان، فجرش رأس وادي بيشة.
Al Hamadani is describing Jarash as a location containing many watery streams, which in the ancient times was settled by the “3awasij” (Jewish nobles of Himyar). It lay at the  mouth of the Bisha valley in the  Asir region. 

There is a town called Qana قانا  in Lebanon (where the Israelis perpetrated a massacre in 1996, when they fired missiles at a UN buidling harboring refugees, and killed 100 people, mostly women and children). There is also  a Qana in Yemen. Which is the original and which is the tayammuni name?

Here’s one of dozens of links you can find about this ancient Yemeni port city, which played a very important role in the incense trade in the distant past:

http://www.fotosearch.com/ICN240/f0020468/ 

Just Google: “Qana, Yemen” and see for yourself.

There is even an ancient town called “Badr” in south Asir, near the border of Yemen,  and I will show you exactly where it lies when I finally pin-point the location of Muhamad (P). I will show you how the Northern Arabs hijacked this name and gave it to a town south of Yathrib (Medina), and claimed that Muhamad faught his first battle against the disbelievers of Quraish there.

But for now, let us look at, with some detail, the ancient and ruined city of Soor صور  in Yemen (mentioned over 50 times as “Tyre” in the English translations of the Old Testament). 

This ancient city has been embedded in the Arabian memory for time out of mind, as an example of the destruction which befalls human settlements resulting from natural catastrophies. It is located in a province known as “Mikhlaf Jayshan”     مخلاف جيشان, to the south of Sana’a. It is in the greatest of the old Yemeni “makhaleefs” (provinces or mini-kingdoms), and during the time of Muhamad (P), it was famous as the homeland of the Qaramita  ألقرامطة  a prestigious Yemeni clan who were among the first to embrace Muhamad’s message. Tyre was their capilatl city. (I will show you where it is on the map).

In his book DoA, al-Hamadani says the following about Soor (Tyre):

و يعد من مخلاف جيشان: حجر، و بدر، و صور، و حضر، و ثريد، و بلد بني حبيش، و جانب بلد العدويين من حب و سخلان„.

He names some of the most important towns of the mikhlaf. Pay attention to the two underlined words:  Badr and Soor (Tyre). Both these ancient towns were part of the Jayshan Province.

Another geographer, Yaqoot al 2amwi, associates the Mikhlaf of Jayshan with the craddle of many clans, among them the Qaramita,   ألقرامطة who were among the most prominent clans in Islamic history. 

ومن جيشان كان مخرج القرامطة باليمن ومن الجند ويسكن مخلاف جيشان بطون من يريم ذي رعُين بن سهل بن زيد الجمهور وفيها الصراريون والرعديون والرّغامد وباديتها انجاد.‏

The city of Tyre perished as a result of a series of volcanic eruptions which left a permanent trace in the tribal memory of ancient Arabia. The town, which was originally one of the most prosperous in the Surat region, tragically became an example of nature’s wrath, and a subject of many ancient Arabian poems.

The famous Yemeni poet, Ibn Harma, wrote the following verse in memory of this doomed town: 

حوائم في عين النعيم كأنما      رأينا بهن العين من وحش صورا

It appears that the fate of Tyre was a truly devastating event that shook the entire region, and was considered the standard example by which natural destruction was measured. So tragic was it that, eventually, it became the stuff of legend. So much so, that many of the classical commentators of the Quran interpreted the following verse:

  {We tested them like We tested those who owned the garden, when they swore that they will harvest it in the morning}…[17:68] 

…as a reminder of Tyre.

There is even a hadith which is attributed to the prophet Muhamad (P), wherein he says to Ali bin Abi Taleb:  

ألا أعلمك كلمات إذا قلتهن، ثم كان مثل صور، غفر الله لك؟
Translation: „Shall I teach you some words that, if the example of Tyre should come to pass, Allah will forgive you?“

Now, before you all jump at me and critisize me for using hadiths to prove a point, I will tell you this: the hadith, regardless if it is fabrication or not, is still an indicator of the trace that the destruction of Tyre had left in the memory of the Arabs. The point is not to determine its authenticity, but simply to point out that the Arabian tribes were very familiar with the town of Tyre, and knew well of its terrible fate.

It appears that the destuction of Tyre by a volcanic eruption was much more recent than the destruction of Lot, for the Arabs to remember it that vividly and mention it in their poems.

What does this tell us? 

It tells us that the Tyre mentioned over 60 times in the Old Testament, CANNOT be the Tyre of Lebanon. That would be geograohically impossible.

Here are a few passages from the Old Testament:

Now Hiram king of Tyre sent his servants to Solomon, because he heard that they had anointed him king in place of his father, for Hiram had always loved David (1 Kings 5:1)

In the entire history of the Levant, there has never been any mention of a king named „Hiram“.  The Lebanese historians themselves have denied he ever existed. Only from the Old Testament do we know of his existence.

Here is another passage:

Then Hiram king of Tyre sent messengers to David, and cedar trees, and carpenters and masons. And they built David a house (2 Samuel 5:11)

This is the famous story of king David, who requested of the king of Tyre to send him some cedarwood so he could build a great house.

Has there ever been  any cedars anywhere near the costal city of Tyre in Lebanon?  

Better yet, are there any volcanoes in or near Lebanon?

For thus says the Lord GOD: „Behold, I will bring against Tyre from the north Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, king of kings, with horses, with chariots, and with horsemen, and an army with many people“ (Ezekiel 26:7)

Did Nebuchednezzar invade Lebanon from the north?  Is there any archeological evidence of Assyrian/Babylonian conquests in LEBANON?  

Which Tyre is being mentioned here, folks? 

Again I ask you the question: Where in the world are we?

I think the anwer to this is obvious. The city of Tyre on the meditteranean coast of Lebanon, which lies at sea level, was named after the Tyre of Yemen, which lay at an altitude of over 1000 meters, when the Arabian tribes migrated northwards to the Levant. It is one of hundreds of examples of tayammun.

What about the name “Lebanon” itself? Where did that come from?   (I think our friend Jafar, who is s big Phoenician enthusiast will not be too happy to hear this one). 

There are twin mountain peaks in Yemen called “Lebynan”  لبينان (meaning: the two “Lebyns”). The name is composed of Lebyn + the suffix “an”, which indicates dualilty (two).  And these  peaks are  located in teh Asir region, not far from the ruins of Jarash.   Lebynan  was famous for snow which would sometimes cover its twin  peaks in the winter months.

Ask any resident of Asir where these peaks are and you can rest assured he/she will point you to them.

Here is what al-Hamadani says in DoA (page 283) about these two mountains:

نذكر سرار وادي نجران و سوائل الجوف الصغار دون أعراضه….فأسرار نجران: شوكان و الجلاليان و نفحةو لباخة السفلى، و لبينان.
Here, al-Hamadani is naming the best known peaks around Najran. Among those are:  Shoukan (meaning: the dual “shouk”), al-Jalaliyyan (the dual “jalali”), Naf2a,…. Lower Labakha, and Lebynan (the dual “Lebyn”).  The mountain peaks are all nearly 3000 meters high, and the sight of snow on their peaks is not unfamiliar.

Snow in Asir?   YES.

Take at look at the following:

Snow covering the peaks of the Surat.

[/b]

Snow on a mountain highway in Asir.

[/b]

So not only was the Lebanese city of Tyre named after an older Yemeni city, but the ENTIRE country of Lebanon itself, famous for its snowy peaks , was named after a similar mountain in the Asir region.

And this is another example of tayammun.

The following map, taken from Fadhel al Rubaye’s book „The Land of the Torah in Ancient Yemen“ shows just where these places are:

– The red circle shows: Ur-Salem (Bayt Yaboos), Mount Zion, and Ari2a (the original Jericho).
 (To understand how these names are in Yemen, you will have to go to the thread by the title of: „The Search for Muhamad has Ended“, which will remain dormant for now).

– The blue circle shows: Jarash

– The green circle shows: Mount Lebynan 

– The orange circle shows:   the ruins of Tyre.

_________

5) Astronomical Proof: The Sundial of Ahaz

POSTSCRIPT TO THE SECOND EDITION OF „THE HISTORICITY OF BIBLICAL ISRAEL: STUDIES IN 1& 2 SAMUEL“ (2010)

[/b]

„The Sundial of King Ahaz“ ; by Anthony Lias.

[/b]

Quote

In 1985, Professor Kamal Salibi, of the American University of Beirut, wrote a brilliant book entitled “The Bible Came from Arabia”. Having had unexpected access to a gazetteer of Saudi Arabia published at Riyadh in 1977, his study of it confirmed him in the belief that the place-names of the Hebrew Bible – the actual location of which has always troubled Biblical scholars if taken to apply to what we now call Palestine – fitted perfectly if applied to the region called Asir, situated in West Arabia abutting on the Red Sea.

As someone who has a working knowledge of the original Hebrew vocabulary of the Bible, and who has published three books on place-names myself, I found the hundreds of examples listed by Professor Salibi absolutely convincing. However, I have recently found what I regard as a further powerful proof that Professor Salibi’s argument is correct. To explain why, I must point out that Asir lies (and lay) well within the tropic zone (between 17 and 19 degrees north of the Equator).

This retrograde motion of a shadow cast by a gnomon (i.e., a sundial pointer) has traditionally been regarded as a ‘miracle’, because at the latitude of the present-day Jerusalem (31 degrees 47 minutes north of the Equator), such a motion would be impossible. However, and I quote a respected figure, the English mathematician/astronomer Thomas Keith (1759-1824):

“If a horizontal dial, which shows the hour by the top of the perpendicular gnomon, be made for a place in the torrid zone [i.e. the tropics], whenever the sun’s declination exceeds the latitude of the place, the shadow of the gnomon will go back twice in the day, once in the forenoon and once in the afternoon, and the greater the difference between the latitude and the sun’s declination is, the farther the shadow will go back.” 
 
Source: Thomas Keith, A New Treatise On The Use Of The Globes. Revised Edition. London, 1855, pp. 336-7

Anthony Lias continues by saying:

Quote

Now according to Professor Salibi, the original Jerusalem of Isaiah’s time will not have been in today’s Palestine, but in Asir, and within the torrid zone. Therefore the retrograde shadow on the ‘dial of Ahaz’ will not have been a ‘miracle’, but a fact. And no doubt an experiment could be set up in Asir at the present time to prove this. (N.B: since declination is the angular distance north or south of any heavenly body from the celestial equator, and since the highest possible declination of the sun is 23 degrees 28 minutes, it is plain that during certain months of the year the shadow will go back for every location within Asir.) It is possible that Professor Salibi is unaware of these astronomical details, which I believe are a vindication of his thesis.

The story about the odd behaviour of the sundial of King Ahaz also occurs in (2 Kings, 20:8-12).   Here, the story makes it obvious that Isaiah knew that the “shadow of the degrees” on the sundial would go back, and that King Hezekiah did not. My theory is that Isaiah (who is thought by some Biblical scholars to have acquired some astronomical knowledge from the Assyrians), duped Hezekiah into thinking he was witnessing a ‘miracle’, while in reality he was witnessing a genuine phenomenon in the Jerusalem of Asir whose existence is proposed by Professor Salibi, not the later one of Palestine. The fact of the retrograde motion of the shadow of a gnomon within the tropics is independently confirmed and fully explained by Denis Savoie in his book Sundials, Design, Construction and Use (English translation by Bob Mizon, Springer Praxis Publishing, 2009), Appendix F (6), pp.163-4.

Now the question is: Was this experiment ever conducted?

The answer is a big resounding YES. It was conducted in 2010 by a Saudi Scientist, Dr. Nureddine al-Mustaqeem.

Read about it here:

http://kamalsalibi.blogspot.com/ 

Conclusion: It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE for such a phenomenon to take place in Palestine, because it is too far north. For the sundial shadow to behave in such a way, the experiment would have to be conducted in the torrid zone (closer to the equator).

What more proof do you need that they have been looking for “Israel” in the wrong place?

____________

THE END…

Bani Israel

1) „Hebrew“ – The Big Lie.

One of the greatest LIES that has been passed onto the world (except for a very tiny minority who are aware of the truth but afraid or reluctant to come out with it) is that Judaism is a racial nationality.  This claim is not only an insult to human intelligence, but an insult to history as well. How can Jews be a „race“, when every evidence shows that there are African Jews (from Ethiopia), Russian Jews, German Jews, Yemeni Jews, even Persian Jews. How can this be? The truth of the matter is that Judaism is a CREED – a religious belief system, no different than Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism. By the same logic, we see Arab Christians, European Christians, Ethiopians Christian, and even Chinese Christians. Has anyone ever claimed that Christianity is a race? 

In order for the Zionist movement to hijack the history of the region and plant their illegal Jewish state in Palestine, it was necessary to create all the elements required for a “racial nationality”. And one of those elements is LANGUAGE.

Quote

Language IS the nation. And the nation IS the language. And there is no life for the nation without a language”.

That  was the famous quote of Eliezar bin Yehuda, the man who is credited as the “reviver” of the so-called “Hebrew” language (when the truth – as we shall soon see – is that he CREATED the language from scratch). Bin Yehuda understood, since the beginning of the Zionist project, the importance and necessity of this matter for the continuity of the Jewish “nationality”. In fact there were many common means used by both the Nazis of Germany and the Zionist movement to achieve their goals. And one of those means was: „Lie and lie and lie and keep on lying, until eventually, the people will believe you“ The Zionists kept on claiming, since the beginning of their imperial project, that there was once, a long, long time ago, a divine language called “Hebrew”, and that it was the language of God’s Chosen People, which was then lost or became “dormant”, when the “Hebrews” were scattered and exiled from their alleged “Promised Land” 

David Ben Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel, once said: 

Quote

The Hebrew language died out, because it hasn’t been a spoken language for over 2000 years”.

This statement, and many others along its line, were used to explain why this “language” is mysteriously not found in any ancient dictionary or glossary, and is not mentioned in any historic document the world has ever known.

The facts that you are about to read will shock you, brothers and sisters.  The glaring truth is that there was never any language in this entire region but the Mother Tongue,  and the various dialects that branched from it: Aramaic, Syriac, Old Yemeni, Kananite, Amorite, Phoenician, etc…

Encyclopedia Britannica states that:

Quote

The original authors of the Old Testament are unknown; furthermore, it is not certain whether those who compiled it were individuals or groups. The Old Testament was originally recorded almost exclusively in Hebrew, with the exception of very few passages which were recorded in Aramaic. The first Jewish community eventually translated the entire text of the Torah (the Five Books) to Aramaic”.

Isn’t it strange that it has never occurred to anyone to ask the following questions: 

1- Why was it translated into Aramaic?
2- Who was this “first” Jewish group or community responsible for its translation?
3- If the language had been dead for 2000 years, how did it suddenly “pop up”, alive and well, in Palestine, in the 20th Century, and in coincidence with the occasion of the return to the alleged “Promised Land”?

Did this “Hebrew” language even exist in the first place?

An article written by Professor G.A.Driver, who taught modern Hebrew at the university of Oxford, UK,  stated: 

Quote

the Term ‘Hebrew’ is actually a creation by the Jewish Rabbis in Palestine, which came at a much later time. This is proven by the fact that the word was not known or used to refer to the Jews in Russia, until after the 15th Century”

(Source: Waleed al Khalidi “From Crying Over the Ruins to the Control of The Arab World” – Al Hayat: 29/08/1997 – www.daralhayat.com)

The Zionist movement commissioned prominent Russian literary figure Eliezar bin Yehuda, who was among the first immigrants to Palestine, to write a linguistic glossary of the ancient Aramaic language, fused with the Yiddish dialect of the German Jews. Ben Yehuda wrote the entire framework for this new language, and sought to spread it and plant it in the new Jewish community in Palestine. 

The giant French scholar and thinker Pierre Rossi in his outstanding book : The City of Isis – the True History of the Arabs says” (pages 28,29), says:

Quote

Modern Hebrew is an invention of the Russian Eliazar, who published a literary and linguistic glossary in the period from 1910 until 1922, as was required by the global Zionist movement, and proposed it as a kind of “Esperanto” for the Jews all over the world, who been promised a new home in Palestine. It was nothing but a political tool”

A political tool. In other words, A LIE CREATED FOR POLITICAL MANIPULATION.

The invention of the modern Hebrew language was a very crucial condition for the success of the colonial Zionist movement. This language, of whom there is not a SINGLE mention in any document, text, or archeological trace, in the entire literary history of the ancient world, suddenly became a living reality! 

Quote

No mention of it (Hebrew) is found in any of the thousands  of  cuniform, and  hieroglyphic texts….nor even in any ancient Aramaic document was ever a single reference to a Hebrew language”

(page 25: Rossi).

Bin Eliazar called for making “Hebrew” the language of the age for the new Jewish settlers, to be spoken by the youngsters in their homes, in their schools, and on the streets. The goal of all of this was to eventually create, artificially, all the elements needed for a new “racial nationality”:

1-  Annex the land.
2- Hijack the entire history of the region.
3- Project the geography of the Old Testament events onto others‘ lands.
4- Invent the language.

In his excellent study entitled Zionist Racism and the Philosophy of Jewish Upbringing” Professor Abdulqader Fares says: 

Quote

“…and so Hebrew became the official language; so much so, that the elderly generation, who immigrated to Palestine, were forced to learn it from their children! This is because the fathers who had migrated from their original homelands in Europe, had never heard of such a language, so they were forced to learned it from the younger generations”.

Now you tell me: Are all these scholars delusional? Or is it the „sheeple“ of the world who have been victims of these delusions?

The fact is that the term “Hebrew” was never known by the Jewish communities living in the various countries of the world, until the 1920’s, when the Zionist project began taking shape.

I will show you now, brothers and sisters, glaring proof that what we have always thought were independent Semitic languages, are in fact nothing but various dialects of one original tongue. And this truth has been declared time and time again by modern  anthropologists and linguists, among them: William Wright, Edward Dorm, Sabatino Moscati, Kamal Salibi, Pierre Rossi, and many others, all of whom have proved that these dialects did indeed have one common origin: The Mother Tongue.  (Think of it as somewhat like the relationship between French, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian one hand, and Latin on the other).

And recent archeological discoveries in Arabia – despite their scarcity – have proved them right.

These scientists conducted extensive research on the Semitic dialects, and found staggering similarities between them, notably: The presence of three-letter verb roots for the words, the presence of two tenses (past and present) for those verbs, and very similar conjugation structures between them. In all these dialects, there are glaring similarities among the pronouns, words that indicate sibling relationships, body parts, numbers, natural phenomena, you name it…

These scientists, who were not afraid to come out with the truth, have realized that the original community from which sprang all Semitic people spoke a language that was very similar to the „Arabic“ of the Quran. In this regard, Muskati says:

Quote

In light of all the information that we, as anthropologists have been able to gather, there is now undeniable evidence which indicates that Arabia was the point of origin for all Semitic migrations“

This shattering truth, dear reader, requires that we reconsider all that we have ever known about the so-called “Semitic Languages”, and how they spread in the region. The traditional experts have always divided the Semitic languages into Northern (Aramaic, Syriac, Phoenician), and Southern (Arabic, Old Yemeni, Ethiopian). 

However, archeological discoveries during the last Century have turned this classification upside down. Ancient Arabic scriptures were found as far north as Jordan, while Aramaic and Syriac writings dating as far back as the 4th Century BC were unearthed in Yemen!

In one excellent article written by member Ayman, way back in 2006, he talked about what was known as the „Language Barrier“, and the reality of Aramaic and Arabic and the place they occupied in the culture of the Nabateans. 

Here is a reminder about this important issue:

An article presented by the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, mentioned that the Nabateans (the people of ancient Jordan, whose capital was Petra) spoke two languages: Aramaic and Arabic. The first was the formal language used for religious, political and legal writings (treaties with other kingdoms, royal decrees, etc…). Whereas the second, Arabic, was the “common people’s” language, used in the everyday life of the ordinary man. The domain of Arabic in Nabatea was restricted to poetry, love stories, tales of their desert travels and ordeals, and folk legends or traditions. 

Please check out the following link:  http://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/avdat.html

Brother Ayman, however, told us only one half of the truth: The presence of Arabic as far north as Jordan, in the pre-Christian times. What he did NOT tell us about was the dozens of Aramaic texts dating as far back as the 4th Century BC, which were unearthed as far south as Yemen! 

The photo below shows one of many such inscriptions. It is an incense  burner with Aramaic scribbling on it, unearthed near Najran in the early 1990’s.  It dates back to the 1st Century B.C, and is on display at the Saudi National Museum. 

The script reads: “This burner is a gift from Naja bin Arshan bin Nahel, from him and his family, as a token of gratitude”

This discovery has not only baffled archeologists, but proved that the great scholars whose voices went unheard for decades, like Pierre Rossi, Moskati, Kamal Salibi, and many others, were not delusional at all when they reiterated what the ancient Greek and Roman geographers had said:  Arabia is the source of all Semitic migrations, and the cradle of all Semitic dialects, and that what we call “Arabic” today existed side by side with these other dialects, all across Arabia. 

The truth that anthropologists have discovered, since the late 19th Century, is that the Semitic migrations from South West Arabia began as early back as 6000 B.C, when the ancient peoples of Arabia settled the Levant and Mesopotamia. Even the most stubborn Western scholars are beginning to accept this fact now.

In an interview on “Al-Quds Television” in 2003, Kamal Salibi said:

Quote

“….This his has turned all that we have ever known about Semitic languages upside down. It is time we made a deep evaluation of all that we have known about this issue. It seems that the known Semitic languages (Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, Phoenician. Kananite, and others…) were no more than dialects of the same tongue, and existed side by side, as far south as Yemen, and as far North as Syria and Jordan”.

This is in fact a reiteration of what Salibi had said earlier, in his book which shook the world The Torah Came from Arabia” (1985) Salibi says:

Quote

There is no strangeness that the Arabic tongue co-existed with the other Semitic dialects as far back as the Old Testament times. Arabic, whether in its phonology or its morphology, is in fact the oldest of all those dialects. And this truth has been confirmed by the experts starting from the late 19th Century”.

Everything that we have been taught about Semitic “languages” is a LIE. The division of Semitic “languages” into Northern and Southern is a complete FALLACY. And there is no doubt in my mind that this truth has been known all along, and hidden on purpose, by some diabolical will.

But, as with all matters, the Sunna of Allah dictates that the truth will ultimately devour the lies, no matter what the rejecters do.

And the truth that will soon be made apparent to you, brothers and sisters, as you read these threads I am presenting to you, is that the eloquent dialect of the Quran is a sample of the oldest dialect in existence. The eloquent tongue of the Quran, composed of three-letter roots sounds taken directly from natural phenomena, was the language of Adam. And it was in this dialect that Allah revealed his final scripture to mankind. 

You can reject and ridicule this idea now, and as long as you want. But in time, eventually, you will accept it: What we call “Arabic” is in fact THE Proto-Semitic tongue. It is a language whose alphabet existed LONG before it was ever written. This is why it has always taken second place in terms of spread and appearance, and why its origins have always been shrouded in mystery. Its relation to the other Semitic dialects is comparable to the relation between Spanish, French, Portuguese and Italian on one hand, and Roman on the other. 

These dialects existed SIDE BY SIDE, all over Arabia. During the time of Muhamad, there were people who spoke Aramaic, Syriac, Thamudic, and even Old Yemeni, living alingside the speakers of Arabic. Until we accept this truth, we will never know the true history of Islam. The Quran calls these other dialects „A3jami“, to distinguish them from the „eloquent tongue“. Now, if you look up the true meaning of the root „3jm“, you will get definitions along the lines of: something incomplete / imperfect  / something that struggles to convey a meaning / something that struggles to be, but cannot reach completion. 

The eloquent tongue of the Quran is the MOTHER OF ALL TONGUES, and is the proto-type of what we call the „Semitic Languages“. Its alphabet is more complete than the others, and its grammatical structure – as phonetic experts have concluded – is a testament that it is, in fact, older than the others.

So now the question is: Where does the so-called “Hebrew” language stand?

Let’s go back to what Encyclopedia Britannica says: 

Quote

The original authors of the Old Testament are unknown; furthermore, it is not certain whether those who compiled it were individuals or groups. The Old Testament was originally recorded almost exclusively in Hebrew, with the exception of very few passages which were recorded in Aramaic. The first Jewish community eventually translated the entire text of the Torah (the Five Books) to Aramaic”.

Do you believe this joke?

Has anyone on this planet ever proven the existence of a language called “Hebrew” – a language which they claim had become “dormant” for 2000 years before it was “revived” in the Promised Land?

Here is the truth about this so-called “Hebrew”:

The letters you see below are Old Aramaic. Linguists estimate that they were used as early as the 10th Century B.C. Now, dear brothers and sisters, note the 22 letters of this alphabet. They are the SAME letters of the Arabic alphabet, with the exception of 6 letters that are not found in Aramaic (I’ll tell you what they are later). The Aramaic letters are: 

أ – ب – ج – ده – و – ز – ح – ط – ي–  ك – ل – م – ن – س – ع – ف ص – ق – رش 
ت.

The Aramaic dialect is in fact nothing but one of the extinct dialects which originated in Arabia, and spread northwards with the first Semitic migrations. I know that this truth is shocking to many of you, but if you bear with me a little, you will see it all. Along with Syriac, Kananite, Old Yemeni (which is very similar to Ethiopian), Thamudic, Saba’ean, and Amorite, these dialects formed the corpus of what Allah called “A3jami dialects” in the Quran, to distinguish them from the eloquent dialect (which we call “Arabic”). Now, of course, the Arabic we speak today is GARBAGE, and bears very little connection to the Eloquent Tongue of the Quran, which contains 6 letters not found in Aramaic or Syriac.

Now, take a close look at the following letters, which linguists call “Squared Aramaic”:

Do these look familiar to you?

These are the SAME letters which they call “Hebrew”! Every one of them! And you can go search anywhere, and surf the net, and read all you want, until you get dizzy and nauseated, and you will not reach any other conclusion. I guarantee it. These Squared Aramaic letters are estimated to have first appeared around the 6th or 7th Century B.C, which coincides with the Babylonian Exile era.  

This is the truth that the ancient Jewish scribes wanted to hide all along. And now, in our modern times, every time someone comes close to exposing this LIE, they will immediately say: Hebrew does in fact USE squared Aramaic letters, but it is a different language!”   

The fact of the matter is that there is not a single document in the entire history of the ancient world which mentions anything about a “Hebrew” language!

Now listen to what they said to explain the absence of any mention of this language: It was dormant for many centuries” (Applause and drums, please!)

And listen to what they said to explain the HUNDREDS of Arabic words found in this so-called “Hebrew”:  In its revival, it made use of many Arabic terms which were introduced into it”.

Have we had enough crap or what? 

What they call “Hebrew Language” is nothing but Aramaic, after it has been injected with one of the rural dialects of Germany, known as the „Yiddish“. The Zionists INVENTED this language from scratch, and then came out to the world claiming its “holiness” and “originality”. 

And Aramaic, in turn, is nothing but an extinct south Arabian dialect. (well, maybe not 100% extinct, as there are still certain pockets in Syria and Iraq that speak it). And you can check for yourself the 22 letters of Squared Aramaic, and realize that they are the very same alleged “Hebrew” letters. And then how do you explain this similarity in the actual order of the letters:  

 

أبجدهـوزحطي-….
Who are they kidding?

We can say with 100% confidence: This language didn’t even exist! They made it up from scratch. And those who wrote the so-called “Five Books” of the Torah are not “unknown” as Encyclopedia Britannica claims. They were originally an ancient tribe from the distant childhood of Arabia. And these five books were at some point, accurate records documenting the journeys of this tribe, whose name was “Bani Israel” in the Heights of Asir and Yemen, and the trials and tribulations they went through. Later on however, these records  were corrupted  during the Babylonian exiles, and then by the Septuagint priests in Egypt.

In fact, the Old Testament itself does NOT even mention a “Hebrew” language! Go ahead and read the entire OT, from cover to cover, and see for yourselves.

__________

So, if „Hebrew“ is not a language, then what does the word mean?

This is what we will see next…

__________

  1. Hebrew” – A Language, or a Description?

    Whenever this word “Hebrew” is mentioned, it immediately brings to our minds a nation or a people who have embraced Judaism as their creed, who speak a certain language that has been decreed exclusively for them by God, and who consider the Old Testament to be their sacred text.

    But is this what the word really means? Or was the term given – for political reasons – a meaning that was different from its original context, in order to create the illusion of a “chosen people” racially superior to all others?

    We have seen from the previous post that this language “Hebrew” never existed in the first place. And what we hear the “Israelis” speaking today is a corrupted form of Aramaic that was created, from scratch, by the Zionist movement in the early 20th century, and infused with the rural Yiddish dialect of Germany, as well as hundreds of Arabic words. And the proof is that the elderly generation who migrated to Palestine, their alleged „Promised Land”, had never even heard of this language, and were forced to learn it from the younger generation.

    The truth we are about to reveal, which only few people are aware of, is that the word “Hebrew” or “3ibri – 3ibrani” (singular) / „3ibriyyoun“ (plural) is an Arabic term, more precisely an adjective, used to describe those who have “crossed over”, or “crossed from one region to another”. In fact, the word “3ubour” (crossing a region, river, valley, etc…) is derived from it. 

    So does this word really carry in its meaning a certain people who have a special exclusive language, and who follow a certain creed?

    If we look in the old and forgotten books of the Arab geographers, we can see glaring clues as to the real meaning of the word “3ibri”. 

    For example, geographer and historian Yaqoot al-Hamwi gives us the following explanation:

    ما أخذ على غربي الفرات إلى برية العرب يسمى العبر، وإليه ينسب العبريون من اليهود لأنهم لم يكونوا عبروا الفرات حينئذ…“

    What is Yaqoot saying here? 

    Translation:  […The region west of the „Phorat“, which encompases the wilderness of Arabia is called „Al-3ibr“. And to this region are associated the „3ibriyyoun“ (HEBREWS) from among the Jews, once they crossed the Phorat].Source: Yaqoot (Mu3jam al Buldan – Vol 4 – page 78)

    Another prominent geographer, Al- Bakri al- Andalusi casts more light on the subject, in his book entitled “Mu3jam ma Stu3jam”. Here is what he says:

    وتهامة: ما ساير البحر، منها مكة والعبر والطور والجزيرةفالعبر: ما أخذ على الفرات إلى برية العرب.   

    What is al-Andalusi trying to tell us? 

    He begins by giving us a geographical definition of “Tahama” (This is the same „Tahum“ which appears 30 times in the original Aramaic Torah, and has left Biblical scholars dumbfounded as to its meaning). „Tahama“ تهامة   is a coastal area along the Red Sea (“ma sayara al-bahri”) which includes – among other locations:  Mecca, Al-3ibr, Al-Tur, and Al-Jazeera.  So the “3ibr”  is within Tahama, which is a greater coastal region that also includes the valley where Mecca lies today.  Then he gives the same definition of this “3ibr” as Yaqoot al Hamwi, by saying:  “the area stretching from the Phorat across the Arabian wilderness”.

    Al-Andalusi and Yaqoobi are basically telling us:

    1- That there was a wilderness area known to the Arabs as “al-3ibr”, which was part of Tahama (the coastal region extending from Mecca, all the way to the “elbow” of Arabia in Yemen).

    2-  This area was bounded by the Red Sea coast on one side, and by the Phorat on the other. 

    3- ALL those who „cross“ (ya3bur) this area of the wilderness near the coastal strip ( “3ibr”), and make their way towards the Surat Mountains (The Heights) along the Red Sea coast were called “3ibran” or “3ibraniyyeen”  (HEBREWS).
     ANd among them were the Jews, when they crossed the Phorat.

    Hence, “Hebrew” was an adjective – a label – given by the inhabitants of the Tahama coastal region and its mountains to all those who came from across the wilderness of Arabia, seeking sanctuary in the shades and streams of the Surat.

    Included in the region of Tahama is also a very famous mountain known to the Arabs for ages untold. They called it „al-Tur“. And I will tell you now what it means, and prove to you that it is NOT in the Sinai Pennisula.

    The Quran calls it:  “Tur Seeneen”   (NOT “Tur Sinai”). And the word “seeneen” is a PLURAL noun. The question is: A plural of what?

    There is a very well known tree which grows in the mountainous regions of  Western Arabia called “seeniya”  (shajarat al-seeniya). If you go and investigate this further, you will see that it is the same tree which they call, in the common Arabic, “al-3ulleiq”  العليق.

    Now, if you look it up in a translator, you get “BRAMBLE”  

    Here is what Ibn Manzhour tells us in “lisan al Arab” about the word “seeneen”:

    والسينينية : شجرة ؛ حكاه أبو حنيفة عن الأخفش ، وجمعها سينين ، قال : وزعم الأخفش أن طور سينين مضاف إليه ؛

    Note the underlined definition he gives us:  Al-Seeniyya = a type of tree. The plural form is „seeneen“.

    What this means is that the “Tur” mentioned in the Quran is a wooded mountain, on which several kinds of trees grow. In fact, the Quran talks about another tree in that mountain:

    {And a tree which emerges from the Tur Sineen (the mountain of brambles), grows oil and is a relish for those who eat} …[23:30]

    What is this tree being mentioned here? Does this sound like it’s in the desert in the middle of the Sinai Pennisula? Has anyone ever PROVEN that the mountain the Jews worship over there was called „Al-Tur“? Moreover, how did the word “seeneen”, a plural noun which appears in the Quran indicating a type of tree (bramble), become the proper noun „Sinai“, given to the pennisula east of Egypt? 

    Going back to the issue of “Hebrews”, we can conclude that the word means: “those who have crossed over” . And we have seen where this area of crossing over is, in relation to Tahama (the coastal strip of Arabia).  

    The question is: How did this adjective, which the inhabitants of Tahama used to describe ANY and ALL who crossed over the wilderness and came to settle in their mountainous region, become a term EXCLUSIVELY used for the Children of Israel? 

    This is another of the many forgeries which they perpetrated to hide the true identity of the Israelites. The truth of the matter is that Abraham (P) was called “Hebrew” in the Torah. Why is that so?  The OT texts speak of Abraham as: „The Hebrew“, and elsewhere as “The lost Aramian” (meaning that he was looking for a place to settle). This is because Abraham was among the first to “cross over” and settle in the region of Tahama. Interestingly, the Torah NEVER uses the term “Hebrew” to describe Abraham’s sons, Ismael and Isaac. Why is that so? Could it be because they didn’t cross over with their father? Could it be because they were BORN in the region of Tahama?  Nowehere in the Torah do we read about “Ismael the Hebrew” or “Isaac the Hebrew” or even “Jacob the Hebrew”.  But we do read about “Joseph the Hebrew” for reasons that we will show you very soon.   (What I am trying to tell you here is that the Torah describes Abraham as “Hebrew”. Then, this term disappears and is not mentioned  anywhere in relation to his descendants Ismael, Isaac, and Jacob, only to re-appear again with the mention of Joseph). This is very important and needs to be looked into. The descendants of Abraham did not migrate across the Arabian wilderness to the coastal mountain region. They were born IN the region of Tahama. So technically, theye were descendants of a Hebrew, but were not Hebrews themselves. They were simply „Israelites“. 

    The proof that the word “Hebrew” does not indicate a language or a particular “Pure and Chosen Race” is found in the Torah itself.

    Take a look at the following passages from the Old Testament, which talks about one of the many laws that Moses is claimed to have taught his people:

    „Now these [are] the judgments which you [O Moses] shall set before them: „If you buy a Hebrew servant, he shall serve six years; and in the seventh he shall go out free and pay nothing.  „If he comes in by himself, he shall go out by himself; if he [comes in] married, then his wife shall go out with him. „If his master has given him a wife, and she has borne him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself.  „But if the servant plainly says, ‚I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,‘   „then his master shall bring him to the judges. He shall also bring him to the door, or to the doorpost, and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him forever”  (Exodus 21: 2-6)

    These regulations given by Moses to the Israelites clearly distinguish between the Israelites themselves (who, by that time, were established in the Tahama area, near the ancient trade routes), and the slaves, among whom were Hebrews who “crossed over” towards the new homeland of the Israelites. The latter were bought and sold as SLAVES, and this was absolutely FORBIDDEN to the Israelites to do it among themselves!   Has anyone ever heard of an Israelite (a member of “God’s Chosen People”) buying or selling another Israelite as a slave?

    But then, why is Joseph called “Hebrew”?? Wasn’t he too, born in the Tahama region?

    This is because the inhabitants of the Tahama region of Arabia, who had control of the entire coastal region (including the trade routes) still considered the later generations of Israelites as being somewhat “beneath them”, and looked upon them with some kind of contempt. As such, Joseph in particular was still considered “Hebrew”, even though he was born in that region. (It is because his ancestor, Abraham, was not originally from that land, but migrated to there)

    This is why, we read in the Torah as well, the following passage:

    So they set him [Joseph] a place by himself, and them by themselves, and the Egyptians who ate with him by themselves; because the Egyptians could not eat food with the Hebrews, for that [is] an abomination to the Egyptians. (Genesis 43:32)

    Pay attention to the context of the word “Egyptians” in the above text. In the original Aramaic text, the word we see is “Misrim”.

    What the passage is saying is: The MISRIM could not eat food with the Hebrews (because they were disgusted by them, and viewed them as beneath their station). 

    The Septuagint criminals, however, perpetrated a blatant forgery by replacing the word MISRIM  (or “msrm” as it appears in the original, silent, Aramic  text), with “Aegypto“.

    But I will show you now how their forgery was exposed:

    Whenever someone forges a text, he is bound to make a mistake somewhere, which gives away his crime. Among the glaring forgeries that were perpetrated by the Septuagint priests (which suited the interests of the Ptolemic rulers of Egypt), was that they looked for every single instance of the word “Misrim”, and replaced it with “Aegypto”. But there was one instance that they mistakenly failed to pay attention to. There is one passage in their forged Torah which mentions “Misrim” in its true context:

    Take a look at this please:

    If the Tribe of Egypt will not come up and enter in, they [shall have] no [rain;] they shall receive the plague with which the LORD strikes the nations who do not come up to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. (Zecheriah 14:18)

    Why is „Egypt“ being described here as a “tribe”     (in some modern translations of the Torah, the passage mentions “family of Egypt”, while in others we read “clan of Egypt”).

    My question to you is the following:

    Has anyone EVER heard of Egypt being described as a „tribe“ or a „clan“?

    If you look at the original Aramaic text of Zecheriah, it says:  Mishfaht Misrim”.  The word “Mishfaht”      مشفحت    is an Aramaic word meaning TRIBE. 

    Also, the two letters “i” and “m” added to the ends of words are used to denote the plural tense in the Aramaic dialect. This is also the exact same phenomenon which we encounter in the Old Yemeni (Himyarite) dialect, and is only ONE of the DOZENS of similarities between the two, proving that they all originated in the same geographical region. 

    Here are other examples of this Aramaic plural form:

    Eloh – Elohim  (god – gods)
    Cherub – Cherubim (angel – angels)
    Katub – Katubim (book – books)
    Himyar – Himyarim (Himyarite – Himyarites)
    Msr – Msrim  (MISR – MISRAIM)

    So the word  MSRM  is the plural form of MSR. (This is exactly how it appears in the original Aramaic text, which did not contain vowels).

    So what is MSR then? According to the passage of Zacharia, it is a TRIBE. And this tribe  had control of the Tahama region of Arabia. Furthermore, The “s” in “MSR” is the heavy “sadd” sound, which in Arabic is pronounced    ص .  This is why the name is written مصريم in the Arabic translations  (NOT  مسريم).

    So the text is talking about the TRIBE OF  MSR  قبيلة مصر

    And these people are the same  MSRM  (in the plural tense) who were disgusted at the idea of eating with Joseph the “Hebrew” (whose ancestors were outsiders and had migrated to their region, and where therefore looked upon with disdain).

    And they were NOT Egyptians.

    Abraham never set foot in Egypt, nor did his descendents.  

    So who are those people then? What is this TRIBE of MSR??

    I will not reveal this information here. I will leave it for a special thread about Abraham’s journey. So I will let you guess and do some research. But I will give you three clues:

    1- There was once, long ago, a GIGANTIC tribe in Arabia, which included many clans within its fold. And this tribe was so legendary, that it is now commonly known to all historians, and is mentioned in many verses of ancient Arabic poetry.

    2- The various clans of this huge tribe lived in the region known as Tahama – تهامة  (The „Tahum“ of the Aramaic Torah), and had control of the Red Sea Coast of the Hijaz, and Asir.

    3- The Aramaic version of the name is MSR (with the heavy ‘s’ sound), which differs from the Arabic version of the name, because there are 6 letters in the Arabic alphabet not found in Aramaic. 

    So I leave it up to you, for now, to try to figure out who they are, while also keeping in mind that the following website (link below) came VERY, VERY close to the truth concerning the identity of “MISRM” 

    http://oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Arabia     
    (scroll down to the 12th paragraph: THE NORTH-ARABIAN MUSRI AND THE OLD TESTAMENT MISRAIM ).

    So scratch your heads a bit, dear readers, and try to crack this puzzle: who is the Tribe of Misrm?  And when you do find the answer, you will know immediately that you have, because your jaw will probably drop to the floor.

    We conclude from all of the above, that the term “Hebrew” simply means: “Those who have migrated or crossed-over from one region to another”. And in the context of our subject it has now become clear: 

    The Bani Israel were the grand-children (descendants) of Abraham, the Hebrew (3abrani)  who had migrated / crossed  (3abar) the wilderness of Arabia and settled in the mountainous and fertile region of Asir, which Allah describes as the “Blessed Land” (because of its rich resources, fruits, and many fresh water streams and rivers). This land was home to the legendary Arab tribe of MSR (as the name is spelled in Aramaic, due to the LACK OF A CERTAIN ALPHABETICAL LETTER).

    So the Israelites were not the only „Hebrews“. They were among those who had “crossed over” from the wilderness of Arabia to its shady and fertile mountainous regions. ANY and ALL who migrated in this same manner were given the label of  “Hebrews” (3abran) by the inhabitants of Tahama.

    And this Arabic term “3abrani” is still used even today in some Arab countries, like Jordan or Syria, where it describes the inhabitants of the rural areas (or small villages) who make the trip to the capital, by bus,  as they “cross over” the wilderness towards the large urban centers.

    It is a word that is deeply imbedded in the memory of Arabia, and provides further evidence as to where the events of the Torah took place.

    ______________

    3) Homeland of the Israelites

    The events described in the Old Testament never took place in Palestine. They took place in the Surat Country of south west Arabia, the mountainous and coastal region stretching from Asir down to Yemen. Hence, Bani Israel were an ancient Arabian tribe, and the creed of Judaism (associated with the the city of Sana’a – mentioned in the Old Testament  by its ancestral name of „Uzal“) and the Nasraniyya (associated with the city of Najran) were born among them, and then spread to other lands of the ancient world carried on the wings of the Semitic migrations.

    The Quran distinguishes very clearly between the concept of “Bani Israel” and the concept of “Judaism”. The two are not synonymous, as the deluded occupants of Palestine and the vast majority of Muslims think.  They seem to think that every Jew is an Israelite, and the opposite is also true: every Israelite is a Jew. The Quran denies this claim completely, and differentiates between the Children of Israel, who were the descendants of a single man named “Israel” (I am not 100% sure he was Jacob himself, because the Quran mentions him by name), and Judaism.

    Bani Israel were a tribe.

    And the ancient tribes of Arabia were very often named after the father of the tribe.

    Examples: 

    – Bani Umayya = the descendants of a man named Umayya.
    – Bani Hashim = the descendants of a man named Hashim.
    – Bani Qurayzha = the descendants of a man named Qurayzha
    – Bani Abbas =  the descendants of a man named Abbas.
    – Bani Israel =  the descendants of a man named Israel.

    {Those are the ones whom Allah has blessed from among the prophets from the progeny of Adam, and those We carried with Noah, and from the progeny of Abraham and Israel, and from whom We have guided and chosen. When the revelations of the Almighty are recited to them, they fall down prostrating, and in tears}…[19:58]

    So as you can see, this man “Israel” came shortly after the time of Abraham, which places him very close to Jacob and Isaac (chronologically speaking). And this man, along with many of his first progeny, lived and died many centuries before Judaism even appeared. 

    {Or do you say that Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the Clans were Jewish or Nazarenes?“ Say: „Are you more knowledgeable or is Allah?“ Who is more wicked than the one who conceals a testimony with him from Allah? Allah is not unaware of what you do}…[2:140]

    Now this may sound strange to many of you, but the Quran clearly says that the entire succession of prophets, starting from Noah and down to Muhamad (P) were ONE lineage. The Quran was recounting to Muhamad the story of his ancestors, who lived in the same geographical region as he did. Nowhere does the Quran associate between Bani Israel and Palestine. This is a great lie that has infiltrated the beliefs of the Muslims, who have deserted Allah’s book and followed the lies of human shayateen. 

    The age-old presence of Bani Israel as well as Judaism in Arabia is clearly attested to in the ancient Arabic poetry. In fact, Judaism was the creed of the Yemeni kings of the Himyaritic Dynasty, ever since it was first established in the year 120 BC.

    The ancient Isralites established, somewhere between the 10th Century B.C and the 8th Cnetury B.C, a small kingdom in the Surat Country. The word “Surat” means the “High land” or “the Heights”, which includes the elevated plateau  of “Najd” as well as the mountainous range stretching from the Hijaz to the north, all the way to the “elbow” of Yemen in the south.  This region is the greenest and most fertile strip of land in all of Arabia, and contains many volcanic peaks which were active in the distant past. The most famous of these peaks are: “Umm al-Qimam” , “al-Qari3a”, and “3akwah”. In fact these volcanoes played a major role in the destruction of the people of Lot (whom the Quran mentions were very near to the Mother of Towns) as well as the People of the Elephant.

    The Surat peaks are at their highest in Yemen, where they soar to over 3,500 meters. These mountains, the likes of which are not found anywhere in Palestine, match the geography of events in both the Torah and the Quran, concerning prophets David and Solomon. The highest peak in Arabia is “Jabal al Nabi Shuaib” (Mountain of the Prophet Shuaib) in Yemen, which is 3,660 meters high.

    The valleys of the Asir region have been also been known to harbor breeding grounds for locusts, up until not too long ago (So when you think of the Old Testament stories speaking of “locusts” and “famine” which plagued the land of the „Msrim“, you know where to look).

    Check out this link:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUDz6bLKtU8

    It is a video of a locust swarm captured in Saudi Arabia.

    Also, you might want to read the following article:

    http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/saudis-warned-against-eating-locusts-2011-02-09-1.353796

    In fact, Saudi Arabia has witnessed more locust swarms in the last 50 years than all Arab countries combined!

    The land of Asir (a large pportion of which was previously a part of Yemen), is the region that sees the most rain in all of Arabia, both in winter and in summer. It is a land known for its wooden mountains, on which trees of many varieties grow: Junipers, Cedars, Acacia, Bramble (Seeneen / Seena’a) and Cyprus.  Its  mountain slopes have been made into stepped terraces used for planting and agriculture for ages untold, and are among the most fertile regions in the middle east. Figs, olives, dates, grapes, and a wide variety of seeds are grown there until today. The honey of Asir and Yemen is greatly prized globally, and considered one of the finest in the world.  It is a land known for its rich resources of iron, gold, and copper, which were much more plentiful in the distant past (the age of David and Solomon). 

    If you think Arabia is all desert, you better think again, as you check out the following link:

    http://irhal.com/ar/forum/travel-1172.html 

    In case you can’t read Arabic, I’ll tell you what those photos are (from top to bottom):

    1 – The city of Al-Taef
    2 – Cliffs near Abha
    3 – Wooded mountains of Asir
    4 – Wooded vales of Asir
    5 – More Mountains
    6 – Mountain roads of Asir
    7 – No title
    8 – No title

    And in case you are wondering why Allah, in the Quran, swears to Muhamad by the fig, the olive, and the bramble tree, now you know.

    There, amid the mountain peaks and valleys stretching between Najran and Sana’a, was once a extravagant domain established by Solomon, the son of David, many of whose relics are scattered around the county-side, begging to be excavated. Later on, the Himyaritic Jewish Kings of Yemen established their kingdom in that same region. In fact, we can safely say that the few Jews who reside in Yemen today are the last remnants of this religion in the land of its birthplace. 

    The land of the Surat was also a region of great economic and political importance in the distant past, because of its location at the hub of the trade routes. It was a land of trade mediation, caravan service, as well as the source of two substances that were prized more than gold itself: the legendary incense and myrrh of Yemen. So rich was this land that the Greek and Roman geographers labeled it “Arabia Felix”, meaning “Happy” or “Fortunate” Arabia. 

    The Read Sea coast, as I will show you later on, was a spot over which the Egyptians and the Assyrians had fought many great wars. In fact, some Egyptian kings launched campaigns against the coastal region, and even delved deep into the Heart of Arabia, sacking the city of Najran on several occasions. (I will show you later the many ancient Egyptian ruins and relics in Arabia, which the Saudis have always been reluctant to uncover). The Assyrian and Babylonian campaigns, which we were deceived into believeing targeted Palestine, in fact targeted Arabia. Archeological evidence has been unearthed in theTaima’a, which showed that the city had been the winter capital for several Assyrian kings, and was the launching point of several campaings directed at the Red Sea coast (the „Tahama“ of Asir and Yemen), to discipline the rebelious Arabian tribes. The Romans did the same, later on, as I will show you.

    In contracst, there is ZERO archeological evidence of such wars ever having taken place over Palestine. The land of ancient Palestine has been proven to be a peripheral region of little or no importance to the great powers of the time. It was not until around 200 BC when Palestine became a significant spot.

    Where was the original Temple of Solomon, for which the Zionists have been looking for for the past 80 years? Refer to the thread entitled “The Search for Muhamad has Ended” and you will find out where the original Ur-Salem was. 

    This blessed land, whose history has been shrouded on purpose; hidden from the consciousness of the world, was the theater of the events surrounding a small tribe from among the many tribes of Asir. And this tribe whose name was  „Bani Israel“, had an experience, somewhere in the heights of Asir and its westen slopes and vales, and left behind a record of it. And this record can be found  today in the five books of what is called – by convention – the Torah (Though this is not necessarily the correct name). This record was, at some point, very accurate and genuine, and documenyed the trials and tribulations that this tribe went through, as it underwent a transition from a life of goat-herding to a sedentary life of agriculture and trade, until the hands of corruption and forgery started to mess with it, beginning from the time of the Babylonian Exile.

    Bani Israel were not aliens to Arabia, nor did they flee to it from the Levant, as the twisted and corrupted history tells us. They were among its original inhabitants. The science of archeology, which the Muslims loathe and despise, is just starting to prove this fact.  And this can be confirmed from all that we know about anthropology as well (the study of human migrations and settlements), which teaches us that humans, by nature, often flocked to places that provided them with opportunities for agriculture, game, or trade, until they are forced to leave by an enemy or invading force. 

    So where did Bani Israel live originally? 

    The corrupted history that we have been taught and that we continue to teach our children in the universities of the East and West, tells us  that Bani Israel were not originally from Arabia, but had migrated or escaped to it from Palestine.  And this, according to them, explains the presence of Jews later on, (at the time of Muhamad), and their communities which were established in the cities of Najran, Khaybar, Yathrib, and Taima’a – cities which were  no less than veritable oasises in Western Arabia. They also claim that the presence of Jews as far south as Yemen was because small bands of them had migrated to there as merchants during the time of Solomon! (They still insist that Solomon’s kingdom was in Palestine, and that the trade relations between ancient Israel and Sheba dicatetd that many Jewish merchants move to Yemen!).  And they have been propagating this crap for centuries, cloacked behind the statement of “God Said So”…. until modern archaelogy began to expose their lies. 

    If Bani Israel had originally migrated to Arabia as refugees, this would mean that in order for them to be established in  the regions of fertility and water, in a peninsula whose area is 80% desert and dry land, they would have had to wage continuous wars against its original inhabitants and kick them out of such oasises. And this in fact never happened, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the history of the region.

    Ban Israel lived in Yemen, Najran, Tayma’a, Khaybar, and other such oasises, in peace with the other inhabitants, and relied on agriculture and trade to make their living, after their ancestors, Jacob and Isaac were transformed from a life of goat herding, to a more sedentary life, thanks to the effort of Joseph who established them along the trade routes (as we saw in the “Pharoah” thread).  If the Isralites were refugees from Palestine, as our false history claims, they would never have been able to achieve all this success in a land whose inhabitants (the Arabs) were known for their love of raids, wars, and looting, and where water sources were more valuable than gold. The Arabs used to kill each other over such oasises…Do you think they would let a tribe of refugees, migrating from Palestine,  simply stroll into the most fertile regions of their land, and settle there without even lifting a finger?

    Please think and reflect on this…

    Place like Najran, Tayma’a, Yathrib and Khaybar were among the most fertile oasies of Arabia. And the ancient Arabs were never known to simply relinquish such places to others. If Bani Israel came as refugees to Arabia from elsewhere, they would never have been able to settle in such places. They would have found nothing but harsh wilderness and deserts awaiting them, and they would have very likely been the target for raiders and looters.  And even if we assumed that the Arabs accepted their presence as refugees – for a while – it is completely out of the question that they would have relinquished their scarce fertile regions to a bunch of foreigners. 

    What we are proposing here is something radically different than what we have always perceived as the unquestionable truth:  

    Bani Israel were not refugees or migrates to Arabia. THEY WERE ALWAYS THERE FROM THE START. They originated there.  And, throughout the years, they benefited from solid leadership and unshakable beliefs and principles, which made them very strong, and hence feared and respected by most other tribes. And in an environment  as lawless and as harsh as Arabia, where no more than 20% of the total area is habitable, one must have been very strong indeed to maintain his wealth and his land, and to protect it from raiders and looters. So how did Bani Israel eventually achieve all the greatness that they had, if they were originally refugees? Was it through fighting wars with the Arabs to kick them out of their lands?

    And the claim that the Israelites were spawned in Egypt, them moved to Palestine, then migrated to Yemen, is nothing but a ridiculous fantasy, whose aim was to hide the true identity of Bani Israel as no more than an Arabian tribe – albeit a special one – and to establish a racist creed claiming that the Israelites were a pure race, and superior to all others. 

    The time has come for us to change our perceptions and accept this truth, or we will be forever looking at our history through the eyes of others…the eyes of those corruptors and forgers who have turned our past upside down, dictating to us who we are and where we came from. 

    BANI ISRAEL WERE THE ANCESTORS OF MUHAMAD. And all the stories of the previous peoples and their prophets, related to us in the Quran, took place in Arabia, and nowhere else. And those LIARS who scattered the prophets to the lands of Egypt, Iraq and the Levant, and divided between father and son and between brother and brother, claiming that Isaac was the „father of the Israelites“ and settled in Palestine, while Ismael was the father of the „savages“ and settled in Arabia, should be all hanged by the you-know-what for their falsehoods, racism, and crimes against history and humanity.

    Until we accept this truth, we will forever be lost in the desert of Jewish delusion and Zionist lies. 

    All the Semitic migration took place FROM Arabia, not TO Arabia. We have been looking at the picture upside down. It is time we turned it around and set it right.  The ancient Arabian tribes migrated from Arabia, and moved northwards toward the Levant, Syria, and Mesopotamia. And the Israelites were no more than one of those many migrating tribes. Migration FROM Arabia is the correct direction of all ancient displacements of people, not the other way around. And this truth, which was often reiterated by the ancient Greek and Roman gegraphers and explorers, and very often ignored, has now been confirmed by modern anthropology. 

    And what was the first thing that migrating tribes or peoples did when they moved to new regions? 
    Answer: They took with them the names of their original homeland – its towns, rivers, mountains, and valleys, and gave them to their new homelands. This process was known to the ancient Arabs as “tayammun” (the word is derived from YUMN , which means: to bring fortune or optimism).

    We will look next at this phenomenon of tayammun, where I will show you how many of the names of cities, mountains, and valleys in Syria, Jordan and Palestine were in fact Tayammuni names.  The most prominent of these names was a city resting on a knoll in ancient Palestine, whose name was mentioned in the Psalms as „The Daughter of Jerusalem“, and „The Daughter of Zion“. 

    So, where was the original or „parent“ of such places?

    I think by now, you know where.

  2. 4) The Migration of Peoples and Names

    In order for us to delve into the depths of Arabia’s history – a history that has been veiled and hidden by the hands of corruption and forgery – we have to understand the phenomenon of “tayammun”, and the effects it has on all geographical searches and evidences. This phenomenon is as old as humanity itself, and will continue to exist as long as there are humans on this Earth, and lands to explore. It consists of migrating tribes taking with them the names of cities or landmarks in the homeland which they left behind, and assigning these names to their new homeland. 

    Although this phenomenon has been unquestionably proven by anthropologists and linguists alike, it can cause some confusion to geographers and historians if it not taken into account when studying the history of the past nations, due to the similarity (duplicates) it creates between names of cities or locations. 

    And nowhere is the phenomenon of tayammun more evident than in ancient Arabia and the Levant regions. And we can see plenty of evidences of this in the forgotten books of history written by Arabs scholars. For example, in his book entitled “Fat2 al – Bari” فتح الباري , geographer and historian Ibn 2ijr  إبن حجر relates to us the following (volume 11 . page 410):

وأما صنعاء فإنما قيدت في هذه الرواية باليمن ، احترازاً من صنعاء التي بالشام . والأصل فيها صنعاء اليمن لما هاجر أهل اليمن في زمن عمر عند فتوح الشام نزل أهل صنعاء في مكان من دمشق فسمى باسم بلدهم„.

Let me translate to you what Ibn 2ijr is saying:  There are two places known as “Sana’a”. There is the famous Sana’a of Yemen (the capital that is at least 2500 years old), and there is another small town on the outskirts of Damascus (capital of Syria) called “Sana’a” as well. Ibn 2ijr tells us that during the Muslim “conquest” (or should I say ILLEGAL ANNEXATION) of the Levant, under Omar bin al-Khatab, the original inhabitants of Yemen settled in that region of the subburbs of Damascus, and it became known as the “New Sana’a” (so to speak). 

So if news of a certain event which happened in Sana’a was being spread, of course the first thing that will come to mind is the Sana’a of Yemen, because of its popularity. But the fact is, the event could very well have taken place in the other, far less known Sana’a which is today a subburb of Damascus.

Now, if we stop a little bit and study this phenomenon in our modern age, we will find that there are countelss names of cities and towns that are duplicated all across the world, especially in the “new” continents that were the target of exploration and colonization. Here are a few examples:

1- The city of Washington, which is today the capital of the USA, was named after a small town by the same name on the outskirts of Newcastle, England. This shows that the people who named the Washingtom of the New World so, were the orignal settlers who had come from Brittain.

2- The city of New Orleans, also in the USA, was named after the old (original) Orleans in France. Everyone in the USA knows full well that a great percentage of the inhabitants of this city are descendants of the original settlers that had migrated from France, bringing with them all the memories and names they held dear to their hearts, as a kind of “optimism charm” to start their lives in the new continent.

3- The city of New York was also named after the original (parent) York, which is in England.

4 – There are no less than 5 cities/towns by the name of „Mecca“ in North America alone! And these cities were named so because of the phenomenon of tayammun.

And this phenomenon included not only the names of cities and towns, but also of famous landmarks or geographical features (rivers, mountains, valleys), as we will soon see.

Going back to Arabia and the Levant, this explains to us the many dupicates in the names of cities all across these regions. And the glaring evidence is that the original name is always found to be in Yemen or Asir. 

You wonder why that is so?

There is the city of Jarash in Jordan….and there is also Jarash in Yemen (same word, جرش).  So which is the original, and which is the tayammuni name? To answer this, we simply need to follow the direction of the migrations.

Here is what the giant Arab geographer, al-Hamadani says about this famous Yemeni location in his book “Description of Arabia” (DoA):

جُرش: هي كورة نجد العليا، وهي من ديار عنز، ويسكنها وترأس فيها العواسج من أشراف حمير، وهم من ولد يريم ذي مقار القيل، ولهم سؤدد عود وجابة اليمانية في نجد إليهم وهم يقومون معهم بحرب عنز وجُرش في قاع، ولها أشراف غربية بعيدة منها تنحدر مياهها في مسيل يمرُّ في شرقيها، بينها وبين حمومة ناصية تسمى الأكمة السوداء، حمومة وحمة وكولة، ثم يلتقي بهذا المسيل أودية ديار عنز حتى تصب في بيشة بعطان، فجرش رأس وادي بيشة.
Al Hamadani is describing Jarash as a location containing many watery streams, which in the ancient times was settled by the “3awasij” (Jewish nobles of Himyar). It lay at the  mouth of the Bisha valley in the  Asir region. 

There is a town called Qana قانا  in Lebanon (where the Israelis perpetrated a massacre in 1996, when they fired missiles at a UN buidling harboring refugees, and killed 100 people, mostly women and children). There is also  a Qana in Yemen. Which is the original and which is the tayammuni name?

Here’s one of dozens of links you can find about this ancient Yemeni port city, which played a very important role in the incense trade in the distant past:

http://www.fotosearch.com/ICN240/f0020468/ 

Just Google: “Qana, Yemen” and see for yourself.

There is even an ancient town called “Badr” in south Asir, near the border of Yemen,  and I will show you exactly where it lies when I finally pin-point the location of Muhamad (P). I will show you how the Northern Arabs hijacked this name and gave it to a town south of Yathrib (Medina), and claimed that Muhamad faught his first battle against the disbelievers of Quraish there.

But for now, let us look at, with some detail, the ancient and ruined city of Soor صور  in Yemen (mentioned over 50 times as “Tyre” in the English translations of the Old Testament). 

This ancient city has been embedded in the Arabian memory for time out of mind, as an example of the destruction which befalls human settlements resulting from natural catastrophies. It is located in a province known as “Mikhlaf Jayshan”     مخلاف جيشان, to the south of Sana’a. It is in the greatest of the old Yemeni “makhaleefs” (provinces or mini-kingdoms), and during the time of Muhamad (P), it was famous as the homeland of the Qaramita  ألقرامطة  a prestigious Yemeni clan who were among the first to embrace Muhamad’s message. Tyre was their capilatl city. (I will show you where it is on the map).

In his book DoA, al-Hamadani says the following about Soor (Tyre):

و يعد من مخلاف جيشان: حجر، و بدر، و صور، و حضر، و ثريد، و بلد بني حبيش، و جانب بلد العدويين من حب و سخلان„.

He names some of the most important towns of the mikhlaf. Pay attention to the two underlined words:  Badr and Soor (Tyre). Both these ancient towns were part of the Jayshan Province.

Another geographer, Yaqoot al 2amwi, associates the Mikhlaf of Jayshan with the craddle of many clans, among them the Qaramita,   ألقرامطة who were among the most prominent clans in Islamic history. 

ومن جيشان كان مخرج القرامطة باليمن ومن الجند ويسكن مخلاف جيشان بطون من يريم ذي رعُين بن سهل بن زيد الجمهور وفيها الصراريون والرعديون والرّغامد وباديتها انجاد.‏

The city of Tyre perished as a result of a series of volcanic eruptions which left a permanent trace in the tribal memory of ancient Arabia. The town, which was originally one of the most prosperous in the Surat region, tragically became an example of nature’s wrath, and a subject of many ancient Arabian poems.

The famous Yemeni poet, Ibn Harma, wrote the following verse in memory of this doomed town: 

حوائم في عين النعيم كأنما      رأينا بهن العين من وحش صورا

It appears that the fate of Tyre was a truly devastating event that shook the entire region, and was considered the standard example by which natural destruction was measured. So tragic was it that, eventually, it became the stuff of legend. So much so, that many of the classical commentators of the Quran interpreted the following verse:

  {We tested them like We tested those who owned the garden, when they swore that they will harvest it in the morning}…[17:68] 

…as a reminder of Tyre.

There is even a hadith which is attributed to the prophet Muhamad (P), wherein he says to Ali bin Abi Taleb:  

ألا أعلمك كلمات إذا قلتهن، ثم كان مثل صور، غفر الله لك؟
Translation: „Shall I teach you some words that, if the example of Tyre should come to pass, Allah will forgive you?“

Now, before you all jump at me and critisize me for using hadiths to prove a point, I will tell you this: the hadith, regardless if it is fabrication or not, is still an indicator of the trace that the destruction of Tyre had left in the memory of the Arabs. The point is not to determine its authenticity, but simply to point out that the Arabian tribes were very familiar with the town of Tyre, and knew well of its terrible fate.

It appears that the destuction of Tyre by a volcanic eruption was much more recent than the destruction of Lot, for the Arabs to remember it that vividly and mention it in their poems.

What does this tell us? 

It tells us that the Tyre mentioned over 60 times in the Old Testament, CANNOT be the Tyre of Lebanon. That would be geograohically impossible.

Here are a few passages from the Old Testament:

Now Hiram king of Tyre sent his servants to Solomon, because he heard that they had anointed him king in place of his father, for Hiram had always loved David (1 Kings 5:1)

In the entire history of the Levant, there has never been any mention of a king named „Hiram“.  The Lebanese historians themselves have denied he ever existed. Only from the Old Testament do we know of his existence.

Here is another passage:

Then Hiram king of Tyre sent messengers to David, and cedar trees, and carpenters and masons. And they built David a house (2 Samuel 5:11)

This is the famous story of king David, who requested of the king of Tyre to send him some cedarwood so he could build a great house.

Has there ever been  any cedars anywhere near the costal city of Tyre in Lebanon?  

Better yet, are there any volcanoes in or near Lebanon?

For thus says the Lord GOD: „Behold, I will bring against Tyre from the north Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, king of kings, with horses, with chariots, and with horsemen, and an army with many people“ (Ezekiel 26:7)

Did Nebuchednezzar invade Lebanon from the north?  Is there any archeological evidence of Assyrian/Babylonian conquests in LEBANON?  

Which Tyre is being mentioned here, folks? 

Again I ask you the question: Where in the world are we?

I think the anwer to this is obvious. The city of Tyre on the meditteranean coast of Lebanon, which lies at sea level, was named after the Tyre of Yemen, which lay at an altitude of over 1000 meters, when the Arabian tribes migrated northwards to the Levant. It is one of hundreds of examples of tayammun.

What about the name “Lebanon” itself? Where did that come from?   (I think our friend Jafar, who is s big Phoenician enthusiast will not be too happy to hear this one). 

There are twin mountain peaks in Yemen called “Lebynan”  لبينان (meaning: the two “Lebyns”). The name is composed of Lebyn + the suffix “an”, which indicates dualilty (two).  And these  peaks are  located in teh Asir region, not far from the ruins of Jarash.   Lebynan  was famous for snow which would sometimes cover its twin  peaks in the winter months.

Ask any resident of Asir where these peaks are and you can rest assured he/she will point you to them.

Here is what al-Hamadani says in DoA (page 283) about these two mountains:

نذكر سرار وادي نجران و سوائل الجوف الصغار دون أعراضه….فأسرار نجران: شوكان و الجلاليان و نفحةو لباخة السفلى، و لبينان.
Here, al-Hamadani is naming the best known peaks around Najran. Among those are:  Shoukan (meaning: the dual “shouk”), al-Jalaliyyan (the dual “jalali”), Naf2a,…. Lower Labakha, and Lebynan (the dual “Lebyn”).  The mountain peaks are all nearly 3000 meters high, and the sight of snow on their peaks is not unfamiliar.

Snow in Asir?   YES.

Take at look at the following:

Snow covering the peaks of the Surat.

[/b]

Snow on a mountain highway in Asir.

[/b]

So not only was the Lebanese city of Tyre named after an older Yemeni city, but the ENTIRE country of Lebanon itself, famous for its snowy peaks , was named after a similar mountain in the Asir region.

And this is another example of tayammun.

The following map, taken from Fadhel al Rubaye’s book „The Land of the Torah in Ancient Yemen“ shows just where these places are:

– The red circle shows: Ur-Salem (Bayt Yaboos), Mount Zion, and Ari2a (the original Jericho).
 (To understand how these names are in Yemen, you will have to go to the thread by the title of: „The Search for Muhamad has Ended“, which will remain dormant for now).

– The blue circle shows: Jarash

– The green circle shows: Mount Lebynan 

– The orange circle shows:   the ruins of Tyre.

_________

5) Astronomical Proof: The Sundial of Ahaz

POSTSCRIPT TO THE SECOND EDITION OF „THE HISTORICITY OF BIBLICAL ISRAEL: STUDIES IN 1& 2 SAMUEL“ (2010)

[/b]

„The Sundial of King Ahaz“ ; by Anthony Lias.

[/b]

Quote

In 1985, Professor Kamal Salibi, of the American University of Beirut, wrote a brilliant book entitled “The Bible Came from Arabia”. Having had unexpected access to a gazetteer of Saudi Arabia published at Riyadh in 1977, his study of it confirmed him in the belief that the place-names of the Hebrew Bible – the actual location of which has always troubled Biblical scholars if taken to apply to what we now call Palestine – fitted perfectly if applied to the region called Asir, situated in West Arabia abutting on the Red Sea.

As someone who has a working knowledge of the original Hebrew vocabulary of the Bible, and who has published three books on place-names myself, I found the hundreds of examples listed by Professor Salibi absolutely convincing. However, I have recently found what I regard as a further powerful proof that Professor Salibi’s argument is correct. To explain why, I must point out that Asir lies (and lay) well within the tropic zone (between 17 and 19 degrees north of the Equator).

This retrograde motion of a shadow cast by a gnomon (i.e., a sundial pointer) has traditionally been regarded as a ‘miracle’, because at the latitude of the present-day Jerusalem (31 degrees 47 minutes north of the Equator), such a motion would be impossible. However, and I quote a respected figure, the English mathematician/astronomer Thomas Keith (1759-1824):

“If a horizontal dial, which shows the hour by the top of the perpendicular gnomon, be made for a place in the torrid zone [i.e. the tropics], whenever the sun’s declination exceeds the latitude of the place, the shadow of the gnomon will go back twice in the day, once in the forenoon and once in the afternoon, and the greater the difference between the latitude and the sun’s declination is, the farther the shadow will go back.” 
 
Source: Thomas Keith, A New Treatise On The Use Of The Globes. Revised Edition. London, 1855, pp. 336-7

Anthony Lias continues by saying:

Quote

Now according to Professor Salibi, the original Jerusalem of Isaiah’s time will not have been in today’s Palestine, but in Asir, and within the torrid zone. Therefore the retrograde shadow on the ‘dial of Ahaz’ will not have been a ‘miracle’, but a fact. And no doubt an experiment could be set up in Asir at the present time to prove this. (N.B: since declination is the angular distance north or south of any heavenly body from the celestial equator, and since the highest possible declination of the sun is 23 degrees 28 minutes, it is plain that during certain months of the year the shadow will go back for every location within Asir.) It is possible that Professor Salibi is unaware of these astronomical details, which I believe are a vindication of his thesis.

The story about the odd behaviour of the sundial of King Ahaz also occurs in (2 Kings, 20:8-12).   Here, the story makes it obvious that Isaiah knew that the “shadow of the degrees” on the sundial would go back, and that King Hezekiah did not. My theory is that Isaiah (who is thought by some Biblical scholars to have acquired some astronomical knowledge from the Assyrians), duped Hezekiah into thinking he was witnessing a ‘miracle’, while in reality he was witnessing a genuine phenomenon in the Jerusalem of Asir whose existence is proposed by Professor Salibi, not the later one of Palestine. The fact of the retrograde motion of the shadow of a gnomon within the tropics is independently confirmed and fully explained by Denis Savoie in his book Sundials, Design, Construction and Use (English translation by Bob Mizon, Springer Praxis Publishing, 2009), Appendix F (6), pp.163-4.

Now the question is: Was this experiment ever conducted?

The answer is a big resounding YES. It was conducted in 2010 by a Saudi Scientist, Dr. Nureddine al-Mustaqeem.

Read about it here:

http://kamalsalibi.blogspot.com/ 

Conclusion: It is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE for such a phenomenon to take place in Palestine, because it is too far north. For the sundial shadow to behave in such a way, the experiment would have to be conducted in the torrid zone (closer to the equator).

What more proof do you need that they have been looking for “Israel” in the wrong place?

____________

THE END…(Originalartikel einsehbar auf http://www.free-minds, the autors name pazuzu)

Advertisements

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s